[Emu] Resolution of TEAP Errata 5127

According to the discussion in the interim last week and previous discussions the resolution of errata 5127 should be as below. Please review the text change below and indicate if it aligns with discussion and implementation. It is intended that it matches the current draft of RFC7170bis draft

[Emu] Resolution for TEAP Errata 5128

I think we still have an open issue with 5128. The following resolutions differ from what is currently in RFC7170bis. Please review the text changes below and indicate if it aligns with implementation and discussion. Thanks, Joe The definition of the TLS-PRF is given in 5246 as: PRF(secret, l

[Emu] Proposed resolution for TEAP errata 5767

Since this errata is about aligning terminology throughout the document I propose that this resolution would be "Hold for Update" since it would require editorial changes throughout the document. We would still need to resolve this issue in 7170bis. Any objection to this errata resolution? Thank

Re: [Emu] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-02.txt

On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, at 20:13, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > Title : Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1 > Filename: draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-02.txt > Pages : 101 > Date: 2023-01-05 Abstract: obseletes -> obsoletes Sectio

[Emu] Meta Issue (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-02.txt)

My suggestion is that this draft not be moved to WGLC until we have working code in hostap for it.  Even better if FR and ISE also match and can test against MSFT. Eliot On 09.01.23 08:43, Alexander Clouter wrote: On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, at 20:13, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: Title