Since this errata is about aligning terminology throughout the document I propose that this resolution would be "Hold for Update" since it would require editorial changes throughout the document. We would still need to resolve this issue in 7170bis.
Any objection to this errata resolution? Thanks, Joe
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
