Hi to all,
In the introduction (Section 1 and and 1.3) the phrase "catch-22" is
used twice.
I needed to look up the phrase to know what it meant. I'm sure that I am
not the only one who does not know the meaning of this phrase, so I
suggest the authors reword this so it is clear to everyone wh
Jan-Frederik Rieckers wrote:
> In the introduction (Section 1 and and 1.3) the phrase "catch-22" is
> used twice. I needed to look up the phrase to know what it meant.
It makes me sad that the term is not better known.
It's also the name of a bestselling book (and a mediocre movie), but
Hi,
Good that publication is requested.
A small nit:
OLD and tje
NEW and the
PEAP and SHA-1:
Looks like Microsoft is planning to stick with SHA-1 for PEAP 1.3 [PEAP-PRF]. I
think that is the wrong choice. NIST recently stated that they plan to
deprecate and eventually disallow _all_ uses of SH
On Oct 28, 2022, at 10:49 AM, John Mattsson
wrote:
> A small nit:
> OLD and tje
> NEW and the
I'll fix that, thanks.
> PEAP and SHA-1:
> Looks like Microsoft is planning to stick with SHA-1 for PEAP 1.3 [PEAP-PRF].
> I think that is the wrong choice. NIST recently stated that they plan to
>
