+1
Other than that, they look OK, thanks.
> On Apr 1, 2022, at 1:16 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>
> I think the note in eid6259 is now superfluous. Can we remove it?
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:09 PM Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
> wrote:
> Corrected URLs below:
>
> On 0
Ok. Then I will reject eid6259.
Eliot
On 01.04.22 14:16, Alan DeKok wrote:
+1
Other than that, they look OK, thanks.
On Apr 1, 2022, at 1:16 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
I think the note in eid6259 is now superfluous. Can we remove it?
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:09 PM Independent Subm
Ok. I've updated the errata text.
On 01.04.22 14:16, Alan DeKok wrote:
+1
Other than that, they look OK, thanks.
On Apr 1, 2022, at 1:16 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
I think the note in eid6259 is now superfluous. Can we remove it?
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:09 PM Independent Submissio
