Ok. Then I will reject eid6259.
Eliot
On 01.04.22 14:16, Alan DeKok wrote:
+1
Other than that, they look OK, thanks.
On Apr 1, 2022, at 1:16 AM, Bernard Aboba <bernard.ab...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think the note in eid6259 is now superfluous. Can we remove it?
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:09 PM Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
<rfc-...@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
Corrected URLs below:
On 01.04.22 06:48, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote:
Ok.
I have edited – but not yet verified – the two errata accordingly.
Please see:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6154
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6259
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
