On Sep 17, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Jorge Vergara wrote:
>
> Does anyone else have any other thoughts on this? I'm not a TLS expert but
> similarly value the TLS Fatal Alerts over using close_notify. If we will be
> losing alerts then I would favor switching back to 0x00.
In the absence of further
If we are going back to an encrypted application message with 0x00, how do we
update the draft to make it clear that the commitment message is encrypted?
Several people understood that 0x00 was supposed to not be encrypted. Is
something incorrect in draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-10, or it there just
On Sep 22, 2020, at 10:35 AM, John Mattsson wrote:
>
> If we are going back to an encrypted application message with 0x00, how do we
> update the draft to make it clear that the commitment message is encrypted?
> Several people understood that 0x00 was supposed to not be encrypted. Is
> someth
