Re: [Emu] Working Group Call For adoption of draft-aura-eap-noob-08.txt

I support adoption of this draft. I have verified previous versions of the protocol with both mCRL2 (safety and liveness properties) and ProVerif (security properties). I am planning on updating the models as the specification evolves after adoption. - Aleksi On 18/04/2020 23:13, Joseph Salow

Re: [Emu] Poll for virtual interim

Dear all, Reminder: please respond to the poll for a potential virtual interim in May: https://doodle.com/poll/vxy5vc4g3cnegpdr Joe and Mohit On 4/20/20 2:11 AM, Mohit Sethi M wrote: > Dear all, > > We did not have a face-to-face meeting in Vancouver for IETF 107. At > this point, the IETF 108

Re: [Emu] draft-aura-eap-noob-08 NAI

Hi Max, Tuomas can give you a definite answer. My understanding is that error 1001 should be sent by the server if the received identity does not follow the requirements of draft-aura-eap-noob. Besides, implementing the stricter checks of this draft is easier than validating the ABNF of RFC754

Re: [Emu] draft-aura-eap-noob-08 NAI

Hi Mohit > On 24 Apr 2020, at 15:02, Mohit Sethi M > wrote: > > Hi Max, > > Tuomas can give you a definite answer. My understanding is that error > 1001 should be sent by the server if the received identity does not > follow the requirements of draft-aura-eap-noob. Besides, implementing > t

Re: [Emu] draft-aura-eap-noob-08 NAI

Hi Eliot, On 4/24/20 4:22 PM, Eliot Lear wrote: Hi Mohit On 24 Apr 2020, at 15:02, Mohit Sethi M wrote: Hi Max, Tuomas can give you a definite answer. My understanding is that error 1001 should be sent by the server if the received ident