Hi Mohit > On 24 Apr 2020, at 15:02, Mohit Sethi M > <mohit.m.sethi=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi Max, > > Tuomas can give you a definite answer. My understanding is that error > 1001 should be sent by the server if the received identity does not > follow the requirements of draft-aura-eap-noob. Besides, implementing > the stricter checks of this draft is easier than validating the ABNF of > RFC7542 (after which you would anyways need to verify compliance with > this draft). > > And you are right. The absence of server-assigned realm in Figure 2 is > probably an editorial oversight. However, I wouldn't call the optional > server assigned realm as RESERVED_DOMAIN. If anything, I would call > eap-noob.net as a reserved/special use domain.
There are all manner of reasons not to use eap-noob.net. I think we talked to the IAB about this at some point and they were comfortable with something in .ARPA, but we’d need to reconfirm. This is a small matter that should be cleared up with a few email exchanges. Eliot _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
