> On Apr 18, 2020, at 4:13 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
>
> This is a call for adoption of draft-aura-eap-noob-08.txt [1] as a working
> group item. This draft has been discussed in several IETF meetings and would
> be the starting point for the working group deliverable for an EAP method
> b
On Apr 7, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Jorge Vergara wrote:
> On the document contents themselves, I have this review: The key derivation
> proposed for TEAP/FAST uses the definition from FAST, which is not identical
> to the TEAP derivation. Namely, FAST used MSK[j] in the derivation, but TEAP
> uses IMS
This is the second working group last call for EAP-TLS
(draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-09)[1]. The authors submitted a draft to address
the issues raised during the last working group last call. Please focus on
the changes [2] in the latest draft and send any comments to the list by
May 4, 2020.
Thank
The EMU WG has placed draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Mohit Sethi)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types/
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www
No hat!
I support the adoption of this document!
--Mohit
On 4/3/20 11:48 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types-01
>
>I haven't seen much discussion on the document. There are still some open
> questions:
>
> * should it be published simultaneousl
This is a call for adoption of draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types/) as a
working group item.
Please indicate if you have any objections by May 4th, 2020.
Joe and Mohit
___
Emu mailing list
Em
Hi Alan,
On 4/19/20 7:18 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
>
>> On Apr 18, 2020, at 4:13 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
>>
>> This is a call for adoption of draft-aura-eap-noob-08.txt [1] as a working
>> group item. This draft has been discussed in several IETF meetings and
>> would be the starting point for t
Dear all,
We did not have a face-to-face meeting in Vancouver for IETF 107. At
this point, the IETF 108 meeting in Madrid is also uncertain.
We are therefore considering a virtual interim meeting for EMU during
middle/end of May 2020. Here are some proposed dates and time slots:
https://doodle.
Apologies for a second round of feedback after some more time reviewing the
document contents.
Section 3 of the document describes how tunneled methods should the possibility
of Post-Handshake messages in TLS 1.3. As discussed on this mail thread:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/0MeocW
>And focusing on that "what to do here.." part and the unused IMCK-zero[j] in
>the previous paragraph..
>How is this supposed to work when an inner EAP authentication method does not
>derive either MSK or EMSK?
>Intermediate result indication of success needs to be done and that implies
>there n
10 matches
Mail list logo
