No hat!

I support the adoption of this document!

--Mohit

On 4/3/20 11:48 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types-01
>
>    I haven't seen much discussion on the document.  There are still some open 
> questions:
>
> * should it be published simultaneously with draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13?
>     If so, we need some consensus on this document, and quick.
>
>     If not, when do we publish this draft?  Microsoft has already said that 
> they won't rev their EAP-TLS implementation until they can also rev PEAP.
>
> * Should the document simply drop references to FAST?
>    It looks like the effort has moved to TEAP.
>    Perhaps we should note that FAST cannot be used with TLS 1.3, and that 
> TEAP should be used instead
>
> * should the document drop references to TEAP?
>   Given Jouni Malinen's comments on implementing TEAP, it may be worth simply 
> noting that we're waiting for a TEAP update document
>
> * Without FAST / TEAP, the document is about 4 pages of text.  Is there 
> anything controversial, missing, etc?
>
> * What are the barriers to adoption and publication?
>
>    Alan DeKok.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to