Thank you Ben and Jari. The updates will appear shortly int he new version.
Best regards,
Kathleen
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Thanks, Jari, this all looks good to me.
>
> Ben.
>
>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 5:46 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> And thanks for yo
Yes. I don’t see a big difference between „WGLC" and "send to IESG“ but it’s
good to have a deadline!
> Am 18.02.2018 um 12:48 schrieb Jari Arkko :
>
> Mirja,
>
>> I would actually rather like to see milestones for when the work is supposed
>> to
>> be finished (send to IESG for publication) t
Thank you Jari and Spencer. The update will appear shortly in the new version.
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
>> "This working group has been chartered to provide updates to some
>> commonly used EAP method."
>>
>> really singular? Or should it be "commonly used EAP methods
Thank you, Jari. The milestones have been updated.
Best regards,
Kathleen
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Mohit, Kathleen,
>
> I’d suggest editing the current milestones as follows. The edit and schedule
> suggestions are based in part on what I think the 3GPP schedules are
Mirja,
The milestones have been updated per the dates and language provided by Jari.
Thanks,
Kathleen
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
wrote:
> Yes. I don’t see a big difference between „WGLC" and "send to IESG“ but it’s
> good to have a deadline!
>
>> Am 18.02.2018 um
