Mirja, The milestones have been updated per the dates and language provided by Jari.
Thanks, Kathleen On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <i...@kuehlewind.net> wrote: > Yes. I don’t see a big difference between „WGLC" and "send to IESG“ but it’s > good to have a deadline! > >> Am 18.02.2018 um 12:48 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net>: >> >> Mirja, >> >>> I would actually rather like to see milestones for when the work is >>> supposed to >>> be finished (send to IESG for publication) than when it is supposed to start >>> (wg adoption) as the first is probably harder to achieve in time than the >>> second. >> >> I suggested edits to the milestones in a response to Kathleen’s >> comments, and the suggested edits include having both start >> (adopt) and end (WGLC) for all work items. Does that work for >> you? >> >> (Although some of our charters speak about WGLC and others >> about sending to IESG… not sure the difference matters.) >> >> Jari >> > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
