Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote:
> I agree that this is still to vague. Does anyone have any suggestions?
> Unless we can make this more specific I think the following text would
> be better:
>
> "The password authentication exchange MUST support password change. The
> exchange SHOULD be extensi
Hi Joseph,
Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote:
So if I understand correctly the recommendation for usernames and
passwords is to follow something like SASLPrep [RFC4013] or Net-UTF-8
[RFC5198], but they do not require language tags.
Correct. RFC 4013, while not perfect, was specifically designed
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
Thanks to the ADs and chairs that forwarded the previous reminder to
their mailing lists. I would appreciate it if other chairs and ADs could
do so, since we are really in need of more nominations.
Thanks,
Mary.
-Original Message-
From: ietf-announce-boun..
Yes, this makes more sense.
> Subject: RE: [Emu] #18 Internationalization of error messages
> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 19:26:20 -0700
> From: jsalo...@cisco.com
> To: bernard_ab...@hotmail.com; emu@ietf.org
>
> OK, makes sense. How about we make the language tags specific to text
> sent from the
