Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote: > I agree that this is still to vague. Does anyone have any suggestions? > Unless we can make this more specific I think the following text would > be better: > > "The password authentication exchange MUST support password change. The > exchange SHOULD be extensible to support other "housekeeping" functions, > such as the management of PINs or other data, required by some > systems."
That looks good to me. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
