Re: [Emu] Liaison Statement on ITU-T Recommendation X.1034

Here are a few random review comments. Section 3.2: Terminology The definition of PFS does not correspond to the crypto literature. Here is the definition from the Handbook of applied cryptography: " 12.16 Definition A protocol is said to have perfect forward secrecy if compromise of long-term k

[Emu] Volunteers needed for the NomCom process

(forwarding a message from Joel) --- Third Nomcom 2008-9 Call for Volunteers! I am pleased to report that there are 48 volunteers whose qualifications have been confirmed by the secretariat. There are 9 more volunteers awaiting confirmation. However, We need more volunteers. Please! Yes, you have

[Emu] EMU minutes have been uploaded

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08jul/minutes/emu.txt Please note any corrections or updates here. Alan DeKok. ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

[Emu] GPSK and client state

In order to make progress I propose the following resolution to this issue: Modify text in the third paragraph from the end of section 10 to read: "For GPSK-3, a peer MUST silently discard messages where the RAND_Peer or the CSuite_Sel fields do not match those transmitted in GPSK-2. An EA

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

Alan DeKok writes: ... > Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths > independent. This consensus call will last until August 19. FOR ... ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m