Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

Since there have been no additional comments on GPSK and client state the draft revision should also include text to resolve this issue along the lines of http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/emu/current/msg00908.html. Thanks, Joe > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

> Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths > independent. This consensus call will last until August 19. FOR ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Katrin Höper Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:42 AM To: Glen Zorn Cc: emu@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths I also vote for independent lengths to support crypto agility. Katrin On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

I also vote for independent lengths to support crypto agility. Katrin On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Glen Zorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan DeKok writes: > > ... > > > Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths > > independent. This c

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

Alan DeKok writes: ... > Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths > independent. This consensus call will last until August 19. FOR ... ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

I vote FOR independent input and output lengths (and algorithm agility). Dan. On Tue, August 5, 2008 3:09 am, Alan DeKok wrote: > The current draft assumes that key lengths for MAC are the same as the > MAC output length, and states this as a constraint. The counter-example > is AES-CMAC-

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

I also vote FOR independent lengths. Thanks, Steve > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David McGrew > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 11:51 AM > To: Alan DeKok > Cc: emu@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

Hi Alan, I vote FOR independent lengths, because it will promote algorithm agility. David On Aug 5, 2008, at 3:09 AM, Alan DeKok wrote: The current draft assumes that key lengths for MAC are the same as the MAC output length, and states this as a constraint. The counter- example is AES

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

Hi, Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths independent. This consensus call will last until August 19. I vote FOR independence. Stefan Winter -- Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la