Since there have been no additional comments on GPSK and client state the draft revision should also include text to resolve this issue along the lines of http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/emu/current/msg00908.html.
Thanks, Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Alan DeKok > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 6:45 AM > To: emu@ietf.org > Subject: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths > > A consensus call was issued to the WG mailing list on > August 5, for accepting the proposed changes to the EAP-GPSK > key lengths. > > The consensus call closed on August 19. Based on the > mailing list response (8 in favor, 0 opposed), the consensus > is judged to be in favor. > > The authors should please update the draft to make the > input and output key lengths independent. > > Alan DeKok. > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
