ópez Gómez
Predoctoral Researcher
Dept. Ingeniería de la Información y las Comunicaciones
francisco.lop...@um.es
De: Peter Yee
Enviado: domingo, 13 de julio de 2025 18:51
Para: GABRIEL LOPEZ MILLAN
Cc: emu@ietf.org
Asunto: [Emu] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc
Thanks, Gab
ge before SUCCESS. Oh well, a small price to pay.
I'm curious whether there have been interoperable implementations
that support fragmentation/reassembly.
But to answer the question, I support advancement of this I-D
and think it's stable.
regards,
Dan.
On 6/25/25 5:17 AM
Thank you.
-Peter and Joe
On 7/10/25, 6:15 AM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
The agenda for the EMU session at IETF 123 has been posted. We do have some
time available for additional presentations, so if you have something you want
to present, now's the
The agenda for the EMU session at IETF 123 has been posted. We do have some
time available for additional presentations, so if you have something you want
to present, now's the time to make that request. And of course, please let me
know if there is something bollixed in the already posted agend
-Peter and Joe
On 7/2/25, 10:26 AM, "Peter Yee" wrote:
These two drafts have been presented at past IETF meetings. They cover PQC
variants for the existing EAP-AKA' FS mechanism (RFC 9678). One is pure PQC,
the other is a classical/PQC hybrid.
The call for adoption will e
Peter Yee has requested publication of draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-08 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the EMU working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls/
__
ese drafts are worth the
WG's time.
Thank you.
-Peter and Joe
On 6/25/25, 4:29 AM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
These two drafts have been presented at past IETF meetings. They cover PQC
variants for the existing EAP-AKA' FS mechani
our inputs to the mailing
list soon. Thank you!
-Peter and Joe
On 6/25/25, 5:17 AM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
I've initiated a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc. The
document was last updated earlier this month but ap
know soon.
-Peter and Joe
On 5/28/25, 3:02 PM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
Nothing like getting a jump on things, so please take this email as a first
call for agenda items for the EMU session at IETF 123 (Madrid, 19-25 July).
We've got a
I've initiated a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc. The
document was last updated earlier this month but appears fairly stable, with
only small changes in the last version.
Please provide your input on this document within the next two weeks (by 9 July
2025) so that we can di
These two drafts have been presented at past IETF meetings. They cover PQC
variants for the existing EAP-AKA' FS mechanism (RFC 9678). One is pure PQC,
the other is a classical/PQC hybrid.
The call for adoption will end on July 9th. Please do send your thoughts to the
mailing list on whether o
25, 2:41 PM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
You will probably have seen that draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis has been revised.
You may even recall doing a WGLC on this document in the past. At IETF 122, we
agreed to pull the document back to the WG for updates to more cl
As you may recall, draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls completed its WGLC
successfully. One last change will be made to the document to use RFC 8773bis
as a normative reference rather than using a downref to RFC 8773
(Experimental). The TLS WG has submitted 8773bis for publication, so it
p
Nothing like getting a jump on things, so please take this email as a first
call for agenda items for the EMU session at IETF 123 (Madrid, 19-25 July).
We've got a 90-minute session request in, but at this point we don't know what
slot we will get. If you would like to be on the agenda, please d
You will probably have seen that draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis has been
revised. You may even recall doing a WGLC on this document in the past. At IETF
122, we agreed to pull the document back to the WG for updates to more closely
reflect what's actually been fielded in terms of most RFC 717
Folks,
The agenda for the EMU WG at IETF 122 has been posted. Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/122/materials/agenda-122-emu-01
We still have some time available in our time slot, so if you want to
present something that I've missed, please let me know. And for th
For the record, I think that charter statement is fine. The sole change I would
suggest is s/user and/user, and/ . It’s an awfully long, uninterrupted sentence
otherwise.
-Peter
On 2/27/25, 10:13 AM, "Joseph Salowey" wrote:
We're planning on doing an a
For those not on some of the main IETF mailing lists, I'm forwarding this sad
news to the EMU WG.
-Peter
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 06:14, Christian Huitema wrote:
>
> I am saddened to share that Bernard Aboba, a long time IETF participant,
> ">https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/be
Hello, tall Australian bird enthusiasts,
The Bangkok meeting is a bit less than two months away. I've requested
a 90-minute session for the EMU WG at IETF 122. And this email is my request
for your agenda items to be discussed during that meeting. Please reply to me
with your requested
Peter Yee has requested publication of draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa-05 as Proposed
Standard on behalf of the EMU working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa/
___
Emu mailing list -
Based on the small but positive feedback on the eap.arpa draft, I'm declaring
WG consensus on this document. Our community is few in number but this spec
doesn't seem particularly fraught, so I'm comfortable with moving it forward.
-Peter and Joe
On 9/11/24,
Thanks,
Joe and Peter
On 10/7/24, 11:54 PM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
Please let the chairs know if you have any agenda items for the EMU session at
IETF 121. As a reminder, EMU is shown in the preliminary agenda as meeting on
Tuesday from 18:00
That would be great, Dan. How much time would you like?
-Peter
On 10/15/24, 2:51 PM, "Dan Garcia Carrillo" mailto:garcia...@uniovi.es>> wrote:
Dear Peter,
We would like to request time for EAP-EDHOC.
Thank you.
Dan.
El 7/10/24 a las 23:54, Peter Yee escrib
Please let the chairs know if you have any agenda items for the EMU
session at IETF 121. As a reminder, EMU is shown in the preliminary agenda as
meeting on Tuesday from 18:00 to 19:00. With all of the juicy discussion topics
that we will be hearing about at this EMU session, you'll all
sending your
opinion to the WG mailing list.
Thank you!
-Peter and Joe
On 9/11/24, 1:32 PM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
Along with draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa, I've placed draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls
into a WGLC ending on September 2
.
-Peter and Joe
On 9/11/24, 1:27 PM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
I've placed draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa into WGLC. The document is stable and the
author believes it is ready for wider WG scrutiny. The WGLC will end on
September 25th.
Your i
Along with draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa, I've placed draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls
into a WGLC ending on September 25th. As of the latest version, it is aligned
with draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa. The document is a short read, so please look it
over and provide review comments to the mailing list. It can
I've placed draft-ietf-emu-eap-arpa into WGLC. The document is stable and the
author believes it is ready for wider WG scrutiny. The WGLC will end on
September 25th.
Your input on this document would be very much appreciated.
-Peter and Joe
__
Please let the chairs know if you have any agenda items for the EMU meeting at
IETF 120. As a reminder, EMU is shown in the preliminary agenda as meeting on
Tuesday from 13:00 to 15:00.
Thanks,
Joe and Peter
___
Emu mailing list -- emu@ietf.org
To u
Dear EMU WG members,
Please pardon this interruption with a non-EMU topic.
The NomCom chair has asked that WG members be informed of the following
snafu that means there are far fewer NomCom volunteers than would normally be
in the pool. If you are at all interested in serving o
Thanks for the comment, Murray. The milestones are there only for the new items
being added to charter. The other items are either relatively recently finished
or in their final stages, so we retained them for continuity. We could remove
the published items from the charter if they cause any con
Group/IAB Review)".
On 3/7/24, 2:38 PM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
This is an adoption call for the eap.arpa Internet-Draft
(draft-dekok-emu-eap-arpa). This is an ancillary draft that Alan
DeKok briefed during the Prague (IETF 118) meeting. Seeing as
it pri
This is an adoption call for the eap.arpa Internet-Draft
(draft-dekok-emu-eap-arpa). This is an ancillary draft that Alan
DeKok briefed during the Prague (IETF 118) meeting. Seeing as
it primarily exists as a forward-looking extraction of certain
descriptive material and IAB .arpa domanrequests fro
I've drafted an update to the EMU charter to give us room to work on EAP-EDHOC
and EAP-FIDO (or whatever we end up calling it). I'd appreciate the WG looking
over the updated charter
(https://github.com/emu-wg/charter/blob/master/emu-charter.md) and replying to
the list with any thoughts you m
Off-by-one-bug. That deadline is December 13th!
-Peter
On 11/29/23, 9:13 AM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
This is an adoption call for EAP-EDHOC (draft-ingles-eap-edhoc) [1].
This draft was originally briefed in Yokohama and while it didn&#
This is an adoption call for EAP-EDHOC (draft-ingles-eap-edhoc) [1].
This draft was originally briefed in Yokohama and while it didn't
receive strong backing at that time, a short re-airing in Prague
showed that there's distinct interest in taking on this work. While
this work is not currently in
Peter Yee has requested publication of draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-14 as Proposed
Standard on behalf of the EMU working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis/
___
Emu mailing lis
Alan,
I've also sent an inquiry to the IAB on the matter to see if they have
any thoughts. I'll post to the list if they come back with any opinions. Your
draft will also be helpful either way as we can decide whether to incorporate
their thoughts (if they've some concrete and coherent t
That one’s on me, gents. I have the action to inquire and will do so ASAP.
-Peter
On 8/30/23, 3:29 AM, "Owen Friel (ofriel)" wrote:
Hi EMU Chairs,
I was looking to see if any minor updates are needed to
draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-03 before IETF
The agenda for the EMU session at IETF 117 has been posted as
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/agenda-117-emu-00. Let us
know if you have any questions about it or you would like to be added to the
agenda - we still have time available, even for non-WG documents.
IETF 117 in San Francisco is approaching and this is the call for agenda
items. The EMU session is set for Friday afternoon (yeah, I know). Please
submit your requests for time on the agenda to the chairs.
Presumably, we will have 7170bis wrapped up before the meeting, otherwise
there might need t
The current agenda for the IETF 116 EMU meeting can be found at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/116/materials/agenda-116-emu-02
For those of you who have requested presentation time, please upload
your slides soon. We've received 1 of 5 presentations so far and we're
exactly
We are now about one month out from IETF 116. Please inform the chairs if you
have items for discussion before the EMU WG at the upcoming meeting in Yokohama.
Cheers,
Joe and Peter
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listin
Peter Yee has requested publication of draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-10 as
Informational on behalf of the EMU working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs/
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@iet
Thanks for updating the document, John. Ill be generating the shepherd
write-up shortly to get the process moving.
-Peter
From: Emu On Behalf Of John Mattsson
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2023 7:19 AM
To: emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] I-D Action: draft-iet
Based on the previous WGLC and feedback received on this WGLC, I believe
there's consensus in the WG to forward this document on to the IESG. Thank
you everyone who supplied input and to the authors for getting the document
this far.
Peter and Joe
-- Original message:
This is a second workin
Based on the supportive and engaged feedback on the mailing list, the chairs
are declaring rfc7170bis adopted by the WG. It looks like we're already
getting into a discussion of the content of the draft, which is fine.
Alan, please submit a WG version of the document for approval. From there,
the
This is a second working group last call for EAP-AKA' PFS
(draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-08)[1]. As you will recall, this document had its
original WGLC in August. Feedback was minimal but positive. As briefed
during IETF 115[2], Jari and his colleagues have updated the document in
several key areas[3]. W
This is an adoption call for RFC 7170bis (draft-dekok-emu-rfc7170bis-00)[1].
I'd call this mostly a formality since it's pretty clear the WG is
interested in updating TEAP and TEAP was already adopted by the WG (back in
May 2011). With Alan having generated a new working version to host the
update
Joe and I have been discussing an interim that would probably be held in
January. December seems less likely given holiday schedules and vacations.
We'll probably have a Doodle poll out sometime soon to gauge the date and
time that works for the most participants.
The minutes from the IETF 115 EMU session have been published at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/materials/minutes-115-emu-202211071
530-00.
Thanks so much to Janfred Rieckers for the in-meeting notetaking. It's
greatly appreciated and crucial to a successful meeting.
Cheers,
Pete
Seeing as how we are less than a month away from IETF 115, please inform the
chairs if you have items for discussion at the upcoming meeting in London.
Cheers,
Joe and Peter
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
itial WG version.
Please incorporate the feedback garnered during the call for adoption.
Thanks,
Peter and Joe
-Original Message-
From: Emu On Behalf Of Peter Yee
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2022 9:58 PM
To: emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] Adoption call for EAP-DPP
In retrospect, se
heard!
Thanks,
Peter and Joe
-Original Message-
From: Peter Yee
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 1:12 PM
To: 'emu@ietf.org'
Subject: Adoption call for EAP-DPP
This is an adoption call for EAP-DPP (draft-friel-tls-eap-dpp-05)[1]. This
document aligns with the charter
This is an adoption call for EAP-DPP (draft-friel-tls-eap-dpp-05)[1]. This
document aligns with the charter item to "Define mechanisms by which EAP
methods can support creation of long-term credentials for the peer based on
initial limited-use credentials." The latest revision incorporates feedback
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
56 matches
Mail list logo
