On Thu, Jan 23 2025, Joost Kremers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22 2025, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>> What is the best way forward here?
>
> What does the documentation for `ob-forth.el` say? Does it say `gforth.el`
> needs to be installed? Otherwise perhaps ask the Org mailing list
Oh, silly me, this *is* the
According to the manual
(https://orgmode.org/manual/Advanced-features.html), named fields in
formula should be referred to by $name when a formula is assigned to
them
> ‘^’ This row defines names for the fields above the row. With such a
> definition, any formula in the table may use ‘$m1’ to refe
On Wed, Jan 22 2025, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Aloha all,
>
> I'm drafting ob-doc-forth.org and haven't been able to get ob-forth.el to
> recognize a working GForth in Spacemacs. I get "Symbol's function
> definition is void: forth-proc" when I evaluate a Forth source block.
>
> In ob-forth.el there
Joost Kremers writes:
The `declare-function` call says that `forth-proc` can be found
in
`gforth.el`, so the fact that you have `forth-mode.el` installed
is
(probably) irrelevant. What you need is the file `gforth.el`.
Where it
comes from is irrelevant, it just needs to be on Emacs'
`load-pa
"Thomas S. Dye" writes:
> It does not (require 'gforth), but strangely (to me) requires
> org-macs twice.
>
> Perhaps ob-forth.el is broken?
No. gforth.el "provides" forth-mode feature, which we do require.
Everything should be fine in this regard.
See https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gforth.
Hi,
Should I be surprised when, if I look at the following
* Test
#+BEGIN_SRC ditaa :file foo.png
+---+
| Hello |
+---+
#+END_SRC
with org-present, the '+' signs disappear, shifting the subsequent
characters to the left?
Should I be creating boxes for org-present in a diff
"Thomas S. Dye" writes:
> My hunch is that the ext: part of ext:gforth expects that
> forth-mode is setup to use the forth-mode distributed with GForth.
Yes. Our policy is to support the official distribution when
possible. Supporting non-standard packages is optional.
> Spacemacs appears to
Aloha Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
"Thomas S. Dye" writes:
My hunch is that the ext: part of ext:gforth expects that
forth-mode is setup to use the forth-mode distributed with
GForth.
Yes. Our policy is to support the official distribution when
possible. Supporting non-standard packages
[திங்கள் ஜனவரி 20, 2025] Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>>> Ihor> Yes, behind version check, pgtk build check, and, ideally, after
>>> Ihor> checking that such method is not yet defined.
>>>
>>> The cl-defmethod itself checks itʼs being run in a pgtk emacs, so not
>>> su
Anyone have a writeup on adding a simple resume.cls to Org?
--
David Masterson
[வெள்ளி ஜனவரி 24, 2025] Visuwesh wrote:
> [திங்கள் ஜனவரி 20, 2025] Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>
>> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>>
Ihor> Yes, behind version check, pgtk build check, and, ideally, after
Ihor> checking that such method is not yet defined.
The cl-defmethod itself ch
I was having an issue where the agenda displays but any command I run
says "No Org Agenda currently displayed" but it is showing entries that
I can tab to and if follow mode is on it goes to them.
I tried org-mode-restart which didn't do anything then I used load-file
to load my init.el and it sai
Aloha Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
It is honestly not our job to fix such things. I suggest
emphasizing
that ob-forth expects forth-mode distributed officially.
I pushed Forth documentation to the Worg repo, but saw a build
error that I don't know how to fix.
Let me know if you have ques
13 matches
Mail list logo
