* to...@tuxteam.de [2023-02-12 16:50]:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 12:33:40PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> > * Ihor Radchenko [2023-02-10 13:48]:
> > > Jean Louis writes:
> > >
> > > > If you start adding in Org "fixed" time with UTC offset, that is a new
> > > > type of timestamp, as it is not com
Jean Louis wrote/hat geschrieben on/am 14.02.2023 07:00:
* to...@tuxteam.de [2023-02-12 16:50]:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 12:33:40PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
* Ihor Radchenko [2023-02-10 13:48]:
Jean Louis writes:
If you start adding in Org "fixed" time with UTC offset, that is a new
type o
* Cletip Cletip [2023-02-13 19:08]:
> I'm going to get straight to the point and try to be as concise as
> possible, just for context: I've been using org-mode every day for at least
> 2 years. I want to make it my personal knowledge/information manager. I
> understand code relatively quickly, I u
Org mode version 9.6 (9.6-g30314c @
/home/hubisan/.emacs.default/straight/build/org/)
GNU Emacs 29.0.60 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.33,
cairo version 1.16.0) of 2023-01-03
Have the following org file contents (using emacs -q):
* Heading Lvl 1
** Heading Lvl 2 with VISIBILITY
* Ihor Radchenko [2023-02-13 17:50]:
> Gustaf Waldemarson writes:
>
> > Does something like that already exist in org-mode? Alternatively,
> > what is the recommended and most portable approach to placing images
> > side-by-side?
>
> No, AFAIK.
Org is already a text structure that has el
On 14/02/2023 16:45, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:41:38AM +0100, Heinz Tuechler wrote:
Jean Louis wrote/hat geschrieben on/am 14.02.2023 07:00:
Then just representation must be clear: @UTC is unclear in those
cases, but @RELTOUTC would be clear.
@RELTOUTC seems unfortuna
* Heinz Tuechler [2023-02-14 12:44]:
> Jean Louis wrote/hat geschrieben on/am 14.02.2023 07:00:
> > * to...@tuxteam.de [2023-02-12 16:50]:
> > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 12:33:40PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> > > > * Ihor Radchenko [2023-02-10 13:48]:
> > > > > Jean Louis writes:
> > > > >
> > >
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:41:38AM +0100, Heinz Tuechler wrote:
> Jean Louis wrote/hat geschrieben on/am 14.02.2023 07:00:
[...]
> > Then just representation must be clear: @UTC is unclear in those
> > cases, but @RELTOUTC would be clear.
> >
>
> @RELTOUTC seems unfortunate, as it states only t
Ihor Radchenko writes on Sun 12 Feb 2023 15:23:
> [...] I want to implement more generic feature.
> See the attached patch.
This sounds very promising. I find the doc and the two relevant
docstrings clear.
However, I could not have it work for my case so far. I tried to add
"(undo . insert)"
On Sat, Feb 11 2023, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 09/02/2023 03:40, Leo Butler wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 08 2023, Max Nikulin wrote:
>>> I am curious if it is possible to avoid duplication by e.g. using noweb.
>>
>> ... I am not aware of how to
>> remove that duplication--all the examples I have found in
* Max Nikulin [2023-02-14 14:45]:
> On 14/02/2023 16:45, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:41:38AM +0100, Heinz Tuechler wrote:
> > > Jean Louis wrote/hat geschrieben on/am 14.02.2023 07:00:
> > > > Then just representation must be clear: @UTC is unclear in those
> > > > cases
Jean Louis writes:
* Max Nikulin [2023-02-14 14:45]:
On 14/02/2023 16:45, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:41:38AM +0100, Heinz Tuechler
> wrote:
> > Jean Louis wrote/hat geschrieben on/am 14.02.2023 07:00:
> > > Then just representation must be clear: @UTC is unclear
On 14/02/2023 22:59, Jean Louis wrote:
What Ihor proposed is time stamp like:
2023-02-14 Tue 12:00:00 +0800 @UTC
I am not sure that combination of +0800 and UTC was intentional. The
following is redundant, but there is nothing wrong while offset and time
zone identifier are in agreement:
On Fri, Feb 10 2023, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 10/02/2023 04:21, Leo Butler wrote:
>> In lisp/ob-octave.el:
>> What is the point of ob-octave-prep-session:octave or its brother,
>> ob-octave-prep-session:matlab?
>> These two functions are unused in the existing code.
>
> Have you checked the follow
Daniel Hubmann writes:
> ...
> After using org-cycle-overview (or org-cycle-content) and then using
> org-cycle-set-visibility-according-to-property I get this:
>
> * Heading Lvl 1...** Heading Lvl 2 with VISIBILITY content...
> *** Heading Lvl 3...
>
I'm observing the same behavior.
Org mode
Hi,
For months I have been wanting to be able to export my scheduled tasks to
ICS to be able to see it it iCal, which is very visually pleasing and
easier for me to grasp my agenda. Plus, I can see it in the context of my
work tasks, which i don't have in orgmode.
I tried this:
(add-to-list 'org
On 14 February 2023, Bruno Barbier wrote:
Daniel Hubmann writes:
After using org-cycle-overview (or org-cycle-content) and then using
org-cycle-set-visibility-according-to-property I get this:
* Heading Lvl 1...** Heading Lvl 2 with VISIBILITY content...
*** Heading Lvl 3...
I'm observing
Hi Tim, org-mode and emacs developers,
* Tim Cross [2023-02-04; 07:01 +11]:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> Max Nikulin writes:
>>> On 27/12/2022 16:47, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Can you then try to test using Emacs 28?
The main question if whether this has been fixed in newer Emacs releases
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
