* to...@tuxteam.de <to...@tuxteam.de> [2023-02-12 16:50]: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 12:33:40PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote: > > * Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> [2023-02-10 13:48]: > > > Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes: > > > > > > > If you start adding in Org "fixed" time with UTC offset, that is a new > > > > type of timestamp, as it is not common in world. > > > > > > It is how ISO8601 defines offsets. > > > > - did you say you wish to represent time with UTC time zone by using > > UTC offset? > > > > - and I said, UTC time is always without offset, and if any is > > represented then it must be +00 > > > > - and now you say that ISO8601 defines offsets... sorry, you are > > confusing me and readers. > > It is not about "the offset OF UTC". It is about "the offset > RELATIVE TO UTC".
Yes, surely is clear to me personally. That we got for sure. Then just representation must be clear: @UTC is unclear in those cases, but @RELTOUTC would be clear. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/
