Re: Org Publish HTML and PDF With GPG Files

Tim Cross writes: > I don't think there is an 'out of the box' solution for this issue. Part > of the problem is likely because the handling of the gpg decryption is > an Emacs function done outside of org mode i.e. org-mode is not really > aware the original file was an encrypted gpg file, it on

Re: [BUG] visibility cycling does not work because org-element--cache-active-p defined later than it is used in org-element.el

Esa Palosaari writes: > The expectation is that using TAB cycles subtree visibility. What in > fact happens is nothing but a "function definition is void: > org-element--cache-active-p" error is shown in the minibuffer. > > The bug is a "function definition void" error when using tabulator > for

Re: Have all the tags of a heading, with a tag hierarchy

Cletip Cletip writes: > Just one last clarification to be sure: there is no native function in > org-mode to have the list of tags with a hierarchy? I have to write my > function with the two functions > org-get-tags and org-tags-expand > to get the result I want : a list of tags that takes into

Re: org-time-stamp-custom-formats with out the name of the day of the week

Uwe Brauer writes: > Which is well expected. So I am wondering, is there a way truly to have > > <31.08.2022> interpreted as a org time-stamp? Timestamp format is hard-coded in Org syntax. See https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html#Timestamps -- Ihor Radchenko, Org mode contributor, L

Re: Support for tagging (special) blocks

On Wednesday, 31 Aug 2022 at 20:10, Sébastien Miquel wrote: > Does anyone think this is useful and might warrant adding support for ? I would welcome something like this, whether as tags on the src block line or as a special header, as Kaushal suggests. -- : Eric S Fraga, with org release_9.5.4-

Re: Maintaining oc-csl

Dear András, thank you very much, I added you as the maintainer of oc-csl.el in the main branch. Best, -- Bastien

Re: [PATCH] ox-icalendar.el: customizable vevent summary prefix

Hi Ihor, Ihor Radchenko writes: > Mikhail Skorzhisnkii writes: > >> I have signed FSF papers. Attaching a rebased patch with additional changes >> to >> ORG-NEWS > > Bastien, could you kindly check the FSF records? Yes, I confirm Mikhail is on the FSF records. Mikhail, thanks for contributin

Re: Volunteering to maintain ob-processing.el

Hi Jarmo, Jarmo Hurri writes: > I see that ob-processing.el has currently no maintainer. I > volunteer. Thanks! I added you as the maintainer in the main branch. -- Bastien

Unicode TODO keyword issues in agenda search leading to org-scan-tags regex

Hello! I use unicode characters as TODO keywords and noticed that the "M" agenda view doesn't find all my TODO entries. My TODO keywords: ┌ │ org-todo-keywords '((sequence "≣(p)" "|" "∎(f)") │ (sequence "◇(t)" "★" "⌛(w)" "🔥(.)" "⚙(s)" "⎇(r)" "⏵(e)" "|" "✔(d)" "✘(c)") │

Re: Volunteering to maintain ob-asymptote.el within Org

Hi Jarmo, Jarmo Hurri writes: > I hereby volunteer to maintain ob-asymptote.el. This file has been moved > to org-contrib, but I would like it to be brought back into Org itself. I added Luc (cc'ed) as the maintainer of ob-asymptote.el a while ago: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-m

Re: Update Woof! version at updates.orgmode.org?

Hi, Ihor Radchenko writes: > Ain't working... Sorry, the Woof! version on updates.orgmode.org is buggy. > Bastien, is there any chance that Woof! version used in > updates.orgmode.org can be updated? It's on the top of my TODO list: I need to finish Woof! rewrite and deploy it on updates.orgm

Re: Update Woof! version at updates.orgmode.org?

Hi Max, Max Nikulin writes: > Or at least, please, clarify which version of > https://github.com/bzg/woof/blob/master/resources/md/howto.md should > be used for the currently deployed version. This is the documentation of the work-in-progress Woof! rewrite, not the documentation for the old Woo

Re: [BUG] org-auto-repeat-maybe: error "Can’t expand minibuffer to full frame" and missing log note

Hi, sorry for the late answer. Ihor Radchenko writes: > You do not need to share the paperwork with us. FSF has a database > available to GNU maintainers with a list of all the people with > copyright assignment. > > I am CCing Bastien. > Bastien, can you please confirm that Bhavin's paperwork

Re: org-time-stamp-custom-formats with out the name of the day of the week

>>> "IR" == Ihor Radchenko writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: >> Which is well expected. So I am wondering, is there a way truly to have >> >> <31.08.2022> interpreted as a org time-stamp? > Timestamp format is hard-coded in Org syntax. See > https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html#Timestamp

Re: Support for tagging (special) blocks

Hi, Ihor Radchenko writes: > They do not. Tags are only considered inside headlines. Trying to allow > tags outside headlines will require major changes across the whole Org > codebase and will still make things incompatible with third party > packages, like org-ql. Not to mention the whole new c