Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes:

> Which is well expected. So I am wondering, is there a way truly to have 
>
> <31.08.2022>   interpreted as a org time-stamp?

Timestamp format is hard-coded in Org syntax. See
https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html#Timestamps

-- 
Ihor Radchenko,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at https://orgmode.org/.
Support Org development at https://liberapay.com/org-mode,
or support my work at https://liberapay.com/yantar92

Reply via email to