-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> stardiviner writes:
>
>> When I press =[C-u C-u C-c C-o]= to open an image file link with system
>> external
>> program. It can't open the image file.
>
> Is it really an Org bug? I.e., is your mailcap file p
Hi everyone,
I'm happy to announce that my package ox-leanpub is now available in MELPA.
Ox-leanpub contains Org-mode export backends to produce books in the
correct structure and format for publication with Leanpub
(https://leanpub.com/). It allows you to write your book entirely in
Org mode, an
Hi All,
Just a quick note: I'm yet to resolve this, so any further
comments/help on this would be much appreciated :)
Thanks,
Timothy.
Hi All,
I recently visited https://www.markdownguide.org/ and thought it
did a rather nice job of introducing markdown. Taking a look at
https://org-mode.org for comparison, it does a perfectly
servicable job of presenting org-mode ... but could benefit from
looking more circa. 2020 than circ
I tried that on my file, but the checkboxes didn’t update. I’ll give you the
kind of file I’m working with:
#+title: Performance test
#+begin_export html
function updateCookiesIn(div) {
const headline = div.querySelector("h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6");
if (!headline) return;
const coo
I'm rewriting a complicated construction where there's an equality
test on the length of the list of non matching elements, with a
simpler cl-some invocation. The replacing code is self explanatory.
>From 918b0e7ba2db438cc9b81131317501b93a45b1d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mfrasca
Date: Sun,
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:47:31AM -0500, Mario Frasca wrote:
> I'm rewriting a complicated construction where there's an equality
> test on the length of the list of non matching elements, with a
> simpler cl-some invocation. The replacing code is self explanatory.
Isn't `seq-some' equivalent? (
Hello,
TEC writes:
> Just a quick note: I'm yet to resolve this, so any further
> comments/help on this would be much appreciated :)
You're only able to preview LaTeX code supported by Org, so something
like `org-latex-regexp' is not really meant to be extended.
Org has limited support for La
Hi Devin,
Devin Prater writes:
> I tried that on my file, but the checkboxes didn’t update. I’ll give you the
> kind of file I’m working with:
OK, sorry about that! Two things:
1) I see now that my code assumes the script block runs immediately, so
it doesn't work if the script runs before t
When I run M-x org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffer on any TODO item from
agenda view I see the below error "Invalid search bound"
I can reproduce with the below config
(setq org-agenda-files (list "~/inbox.org"))
Contents of inbox.org:
* TODO [#A] Weekly Review
SCHEDULED: <2020-06-13 Sat>
:PRO
Hi,
I have set ~org-log-done~ to ~nil~, but whenever I change state of a
repeated task, I see something like this inserted in the body of the
task:
> - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2020-06-07 Sun 10:00]
As far as I know, I can turn off this kind of logging individually for
each TODO ite
Hi Devin and all,
Devin Prater writes:
> Yeah, I was hoping to just have an HTML page or something that could
> be put on Github or just sent in an email attachment, where checking
> checkboxes would update the fraction cookie.
I hacked together a quick solution for this. You should be able to
Bahodir Mansurov writes:
> I have set ~org-log-done~ to ~nil~, but whenever I change state of a
> repeated task, I see something like this inserted in the body of the
> task:
>
>> - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2020-06-07 Sun 10:00]
>
> As far as I know, I can turn off this kind of loggin
Hello,
Mario Frasca writes:
> On 13/06/2020 17:18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Unit tests are not worth a formal definition. However, "test-ox.el"
>> contains unit tests.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by the first sentence
I mean that, even though unit tests are great, and certainly welcome, we
Hello,
writes:
> Isn't `seq-some' equivalent? (in this case, at least; cl-some is
> willing to take more than one sequence).
This is only tangential to your question, but, unfortunately, we cannot
use `seq-some' as Org still supports Emacs 24.3.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 09:28:54PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
> > [seq-some?]
> This is only tangential to your question, but, unfortunately, we cannot
> use `seq-some' as Org still supports Emacs 24.3.
Thanks
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
Mario Frasca writes:
> I'm rewriting a complicated construction where there's an equality
> test on the length of the list of non matching elements, with a
> simpler cl-some invocation. The replacing code is self explanatory.
>
> Subject: [PATCH] lisp/org-plot.el: reducing complexity of
Ah, I’m using Safari on MacOS 10.15. I can try with Chrome as well, though.
> On Jun 14, 2020, at 11:59 AM, Richard Lawrence wrote:
>
> Hi Devin,
>
> Devin Prater writes:
>
>> I tried that on my file, but the checkboxes didn’t update. I’ll give you the
>> kind of file I’m working with:
>
>
stardiviner writes:
> I tested with command "emacs -q" and an minimal Emacs config. Both failed to
> started. I also record an screen video to show this problem.
>
> Link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1iBbcStvNCwdN1vB8ivISdw password code:
> r6ws
I cannot see the video. But this isn't an ECM either.
tkgeo...@cock.li writes:
> When I run M-x org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffer on any TODO item from
> agenda view I see the below error "Invalid search bound"
>
> I can reproduce with the below config
> [...]
Thanks for the report. This was introduced by 1aa095ccf (Fix drawer
invisibility, 2020-
Stig Brautaset writes:
> I'm seeing some weirdness with tags-todo vs tags custom agenda commands.
> Below is the smallest case I've managed to narrow it down to. I would
> *expect* that all the a1-4 commands return the same results, and that
> the b1-4 return the same results. That is not what I'm
21 matches
Mail list logo
