2016-05-19 10:27 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Goaziou :
>
> FWIW, I cannot reproduce it. You may want to debug
> `org-fast-tag-selection' to understand what happens in your case.
>
> Are you using dedicated windows or some such ?
No. I will try and debug. Thank you for your assistance.
On 2016-05-19 at 23:33, Charles C. Berry wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2016, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>
>> I've noticed that code and results are all getting exported in the
>> latest Org mode git head. This is new behavior. I haven't traced it
>> to what commit caused this change, but the stock 8.2.10 insta
On 2016-05-20 at 07:12, Ken Mankoff wrote:
> On 2016-05-19 at 23:33, Charles C. Berry wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 May 2016, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>
> (setq org-export-babel-evaluate t)
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC octave :exports results :cache nil
> "hello, world"
> #+END_SRC
> #+RESULTS:
> : hello, world
>
> Yes, th
Hello,
Samuel Wales writes:
> that would only either allow case folding or no case folding. in
> isearch, if you search for lowercase, it folds. if you search for
> uppercase CATEGORY, it doesn't.
I added `org-occur-case-fold-search' variable in master. Setting it to
`smart' should mimic ise
Hi.
I'm trying to apply the approach of litteral devops described in
http://www.howardism.org/Technical/Emacs/literate-devops.html and
noticed the following issue.
I'm trying to use execute shell blocks of the following form ("remote"
execution of
commands inside a Vagrant VM via tramp through s
Hi,
1. When I insert date and time format (C-u C-c .) the hour display in emacs
calendar is the same as my system hour. Nonetheless,org-mode insert a different
hour (it adds automatically 3 hours)
2. I make tests with different time zones and the same problem appeared.
3. When the time zone is UT
Hi List,
I'm repeating a question here from a recent bug report because I have a feeling
official-looking bug reports might get read less than normal questions. Sorry
for the re-post.
As of an Org git commit a few weeks ago, Org exporting (and therefore Org) has
become basically unusable for m
Arising from a discussion here a couple of weeks ago, I'm thinking about
how best to add a history list to org-capture's current
%^{prompt|default|choice2|...|choiceN} escape syntax. Here's my thinking
so far.
%^{prompt|'histList}
%^{prompt|default|'histList}
%^{prompt|default|choiceToPrepend|...|
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Ken Mankoff wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I'm repeating a question here from a recent bug report because I have a
> feeling official-looking bug reports might get read less than normal
> questions. Sorry for the re-post.
>
> As of an Org git commit a few weeks ago, Org
On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 15:57, Ken Mankoff wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I'm repeating a question here from a recent bug report because I have
> a feeling official-looking bug reports might get read less than normal
> questions. Sorry for the re-post.
>
> As of an Org git commit a few weeks ago, Org expo
Eric: You're running something newer (by date) than the commit which changed
the behavior, which was:
ec615b1 - Fix `org-export-babel-evaluate' handling (2016-04-28)
But with all the branches in git, I don't know if you have that commit or not.
Anyway, I'm not sure why it works for you. It doe
Hi Eric,
On 2016-05-20 at 12:59, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> When I export, org asks whether to evaluate the code block and I
> respond with no. The existing results block is therefore exported but
> not changed. If I say yes, a new results block is generated and
> exported (and I can tell because it i
On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 17:06, Ken Mankoff wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for clarifying your workflow. That seems to work for a small
> example. But what would you do if you had a manuscript with 100 code
> blocks in it? And in general you're exporting it a lot without
> changing anything in code, just
On Wed, May 18 2016, Rasmus wrote:
> Hi Daniele,
>
>> So... here is the patch for worg about python and utf-8! I skipped
>> the part related to the tables, since I do not have a clean
>> workaround.
>
> Thanks for contributing to Worg!
>
> For Worg you just need to have your ssh key added. Then
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 17:06, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Thanks for clarifying your workflow. That seems to work for a small
>> example. But what would you do if you had a manuscript with 100 code
>> blocks in it? And in general you
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>
> Eric: You're running something newer (by date) than the commit which changed
> the behavior, which was:
>
> ec615b1 - Fix `org-export-babel-evaluate' handling (2016-04-28)
>
> But with all the branches in git, I don't know if you have that
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Ken Mankoff wrote:
On 2016-05-20 at 07:12, Ken Mankoff wrote:
On 2016-05-19 at 23:33, Charles C. Berry wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Ken Mankoff wrote:
(setq org-export-babel-evaluate t)
#+BEGIN_SRC octave :exports results :cache nil
"hello, world"
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS:
On 2016-05-20 at 13:11, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 17:06, Ken Mankoff wrote:
> So, if I understand correctly, you have org-export-babel-evaluate set
> to nil?
yes.
> If I set that, I no longer get asked whether I want anything evaluated
> but the (existing) results do get e
Nicolas Goaziou added to To: field, because he committed the change.
Question: Why does "org-export-babel-evaluate" change what is exported?
Shouldn't it just change what is evaluated at export time? That is what the doc
string implies. A recent commit changed this behavior.
-k.
On 2016-05-
On 2016-05-20 at 13:29, Charles C. Berry wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2016, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>>>
>>> #+BEGIN_SRC octave :exports results :cache nil
>>> "hello, world"
>>> #+END_SRC
>>> #+RESULTS:
>>> : hello, world
>>>
>>> Yes, the above appears to work.
>
> Really? I do not see the hash in your res
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Ken Mankoff wrote:
On 2016-05-20 at 13:29, Charles C. Berry wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Ken Mankoff wrote:
#+BEGIN_SRC octave :exports results :cache nil
"hello, world"
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS:
: hello, world
Yes, the above appears to work.
Really? I do not see the hash
Hi there,
In my group, we typically response to reviewers comments (in latex) by first
defining the following command in the header
\newcommand{\response}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
then marking up the text as follows
\response{red text}
I try to do the same in org, i.e., putting
#+latex_heade
On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 16:45, Ken Mankoff wrote:
> Eric: You're running something newer (by date) than the commit which
> changed the behavior, which was:
>
> ec615b1 - Fix `org-export-babel-evaluate' handling (2016-04-28)
>
> But with all the branches in git, I don't know if you have that commi
On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 18:10, Doyley, Marvin M. wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In my group, we typically response to reviewers comments (in latex) by first
> defining the following command in the header
>
> \newcommand{\response}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
> then marking up the text as follows
>
> \respo
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> Done, just pushed the change succesfully! I will look forward to
> integrate more docs about org-mode and python.
Grazie mille!
Caio
--
C is for Cookie
Ken Mankoff writes:
> On 2016-05-20 at 13:11, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 17:06, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>> So, if I understand correctly, you have org-export-babel-evaluate set
>> to nil?
>
> yes.
>
Are you getting an evaluation on export? I don't get that with o-e-b-e
set to n
thank you!
On 5/20/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> I added `org-occur-case-fold-search' variable in master. Setting it to
> `smart' should mimic isearch when calling org-occur.
--
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it.
On 2016-05-20, at 20:45, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 18:10, Doyley, Marvin M. wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> In my group, we typically response to reviewers comments (in latex) by first
>> defining the following command in the header
>>
>> \newcommand{\response}[1]{\textcolor{re
lad writes:
> I attempted to follow this blog to enable a background html export on
> org file save:
>
> http://stephanus-volke.de/posts/2015/Dez/22/org-mode-live-preview-en/
>
> I tried adding the following to the top of the org file:
>
> # -*- after-save-hook: org-html-export-to-html;
>
Hello,
Uwe Brauer writes:
> Please look at the following example
>
> \documentclass[addpoints,12pt]{exam}
> \begin{document}
> %
> [[file:~/ALLES/tex/vorlesungen/HGBioQuim/Examen+geogebra/Examen2/README.org::*Overview][Overview]]
> \begin{questions}
> %
> [[file:~/ALLES/tex/vorlesungen/HGBio
Mambo Levis writes:
> Hi,
>
> 1. When I insert date and time format (C-u C-c .) the hour display in emacs
> calendar is the same as my
> system hour. Nonetheless,
> org-mode insert a different hour (it adds automatically 3 hours)
>
FWIW, everything is working fine here.
But I don't understand
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Nick Dokos wrote:
Ken Mankoff writes:
[deleted discussion of `org-export-babel-evaluate' settings]
With ":exports results" and o-e-b-e set to nil, I get no evaluation on
export, but I get both code and results in the output.
There may have been a misunderstanding, b
Thanks,
I will give Eric’s suggestion a go.
Cheers,
M
On May 20, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Marcin Borkowski
mailto:mb...@mbork.pl>> wrote:
On 2016-05-20, at 20:45, Eric S Fraga
mailto:e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 18:10, Doyley, Marvin M. wrote:
Hi there,
In my group, we ty
On Fri, May 20, 2016, at 01:14 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> lad writes:
>
> > I attempted to follow this blog to enable a background html export on
> > org file save:
> >
> > http://stephanus-volke.de/posts/2015/Dez/22/org-mode-live-preview-en/
> >
> > I tried adding the following to the top of the
Hello,
Alex writes:
> As per the title, orgtbl-mode doesn't overwrite whitespace in tables
> like it does normally in org-mode.
Fixed. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
You can use also macros in combination with latex \newcommand:
Following there's a sample with html:
#+MACRO: color @@html:$2@@
# macro sample: {{{color(red, aceitação)}}}
Note: untested with latex newcommand1
Cheers,
LEslie
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
Hello,
Brian Carlson writes:
> Hello other org mode aficionados! (I apologize for the errant email I
> send a minute ago. )
>
> I have created a (possible) patch to the export (ox.el and other
> ox-XXX.el) files that allow for "source code" and "example" blocks to
> have line numbers starting
Mambo Levis writes:
> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 12:45 PM, Mambo Levis wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I reported an issue (see bellow). How can I see its status? I open
> an account in lists.gnu.org
> Mailing Lists but I couldn't find
> how to search for a reported issue.
>
Did you send it to the
Hello,
Mambo Levis writes:
> On Thursday, May 19, 2016 12:45 PM, Mambo Levis
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> 1.) By testing org-mode release_8.3.4.zip from (
> http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/) without compile it in emacs
> 25.1.50.1 an error is shown
> when typing M-RET to add a new heading
Alex G writes:
>> > Backspace works as expected, however.
>> I'm afraid that as of org-20160516 on ELPA, backspace also does not
>> overwrite whitespace.
>
> Oh, it seems like backspace works fine in text modes like
> fundamental-mode and message-mode, but not prog-derived modes. I'd say
> that's
Hi Chuck,
On 2016-05-20 at 13:48, Charles C. Berry wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 May 2016, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>>
>> I'm still trying to find a way where:
>> + code results do export
>> + code does not export
>> + code does not evaluate at export
>> + code can still be evaluated by me
>>
>
> So, you wa
On 2016-05-20 at 14:46, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Are you getting an evaluation on export? I don't get that with o-e-b-e
> set to nil.
No I was not, but things were still exporting, which was confusing. I agree,
seems like a bug.
> ... the fact that I get both code and results even if I specify
> "
Eric’s suggestion works like a charm with the following modification
#+latex_header:\newenvironment{response}{\color{red}}{\ignorespacesafterend}
Thanks I really appreciate the help.
Cheers,
M
On May 20, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Leslie Watter
mailto:les...@watter.net>> wrote:
You can use also macros
43 matches
Mail list logo
