> I have made a decision not to merge org-lparse, org-xhtml & org-odt in
> to Orgmode core. It is a very difficult decision for me to take
> considering that I had put all my heart in to it. (Btw, this decision
> has nothing to with me not having enough time at hand.)
This comes as a surprise. Did
Hi Yagnesh,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:47 AM, yagnesh raghava wrote:
> when I do C-c C-x C-a to archive a entry in the agenda view i get the
> following back trace
>
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil)
> string-match("^/tmp_mnt/" nil)
> abbreviate-file-name(nil)
>
Eric Schulte writes:
> Christian Egli writes:
>> In the mean time I moved the intro to the FIXME directory so that my
>> stuff would be published on worg. Now that the intro exports do you want
>> me to move it back to where it belongs?
>
> Yes, that would be great. Thanks -- Eric
Done.
Thanks
Hi!
First of all thanks for your efforts. I just started to rely on org-odt and am
a little bit puzzled by your decision.
Will you take care of org-odt working in orgmode for the foreseeable future or
don`t you care about orgmode anymore?
Just to be clear: It`s of course totally your decision
Good morning all,
I’ve got some answers for Bastien and Ista below.
On 19 Aug 2011, at 22:10, Bastien wrote:
> Peter Frings writes:
>
>> When loading the starter-kit from Kieran Healy [1],
>
> AFAIU, this starter-kit relies on the commit c88c76b of Org:
> https://github.com/kjhealy/emacs-
I just sent this mail to Suvavu only.. apologies to Suvavu for duplicate
mail
Hi Suvayu.,
On 08/22/2011 04:17 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
Hi Yagnesh,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:47 AM, yagnesh raghava wrote:
when I do C-c C-x C-a to archive a entry in the agenda view i get the
following back t
What would it take to get an Agenda tags view that indented nested
TODOs? I've always been bothered by the fact that nested TODOs within a
subtree are all flattened for the agenda view, so sometimes it's hard to
tell that several TODOs all belong to one "bigger" TODO.
I guess it would have to go i
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> What would it take to get an Agenda tags view that indented nested
> TODOs? I've always been bothered by the fact that nested TODOs within a
> subtree are all flattened for the agenda view, so sometimes it's hard to
> tell that several TODOs all belong to one "bigger" TO
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> On Sun, Aug 21 2011, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> On 21.8.2011, at 15:17, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>>>
Am I wrong, or is there no way to filter what is shown in the
weekly/daily agenda view? I'm creating custom agendas with multiple
>
On Mon, Aug 22 2011, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> What would it take to get an Agenda tags view that indented nested
>> TODOs? I've always been bothered by the fact that nested TODOs within a
>> subtree are all flattened for the agenda view, so sometimes it's hard to
>> tell
Dear all,
please allow me to follow up on this mail with the question of how
this is really done.
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 20:03, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Le Wang writes:
>> I'm seeing another issue now, where if any org contact has a birthday
>> pre 1970, I get the error "Bad sexp at line xxx ..."
Hi Jambunathan,
> I have made a decision not to merge org-lparse, org-xhtml & org-odt in
> to Orgmode core. It is a very difficult decision for me to take
> considering that I had put all my heart in to it. (Btw, this decision
> has nothing to with me not having enough time at hand.)
As all, I'm
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22 2011, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>>
>>> What would it take to get an Agenda tags view that indented nested
>>> TODOs? I've always been bothered by the fact that nested TODOs within a
>>> subtree are all flattened for the agend
I use the following function to jump quickly to first level headings
in my org mode files:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(defun my-org-global-goto ()
(interactive)
(let ((org-completion-use-ido t)
(org-outline-path-complete-in-steps nil)
(org
Le 22 Aug 2011 14:26, Sebastien Vauban a écrit:
> > That's pretty interesting, but not quite what I meant: I was thinking
> > that TODOs would be first sorted by outline level, and then only TODOs
> > that belonged to a subtree with "higher" TODOs would be indented. With
> > "indented", a second-le
Olivier Schwander writes:
> * Garden
> ** TODO Cut the flowers
> * Home
> ** TODO Cut the flowers
>
> should be presented somehow like in the refile view, as:
>
> TODO Garden / Cut the flowers
> TODO Home / Cut the flowers
>
> instead of the unclear:
>
> TODO Cut the flowers
> TODO Cut the flower
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Olivier Schwander
wrote:
> Yes, I was looking for the same kind of thing some times ago. But I do
> not have any idea of how we may present the agenda view. Maybe it should
> be better do display the path to a TODO item, since parent item may be
> not TODO items by
Hi John,
John Hendy wrote:
> wrote:
>> Yes, I was looking for the same kind of thing some times ago. But I do not
>> have any idea of how we may present the agenda view. Maybe it should be
>> better do display the path to a TODO item, since parent item may be not
>> TODO items by themselves, like
Hi all, I'm considering switching my lengthy .emacs over to a literate Org
file, using ob-tangle, and as I was wondering if others had any experience
with this, and if so, does it slow down startup much? Is there a way to get
ob-tangle to compile the resulting Elisp file? I'm guessing it does not
Hi Chuck,
I just pushed up another fix, after which your example exports cleanly
on my system. Please give this another try and let me know if it is now
working for you as well.
Thanks -- Eric
"Charles C. Berry" writes:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Eric Schulte wrote:
>
>> I've just pushed up a cha
Matt Lundin writes:
> Since the commit c25165c25dc9fdb5b57b3c66b2e0ec0efdbeb7ad on August 18,
> I can only call this function when I am beneath the first level heading
> of an org-mode file. Otherwise I receive the following error:
Here's a patch that allows one to call (org-refile t) in a non o
Hello all,
On 19 Aug 2011, at 22:10, Bastien wrote:
> Let us know if you make progress,
Yes, I did. I did find the offending command. Hooray!
(setq org-replace-disputed-keys t)
Was set in the init.el file of the starter-kit.
Now, is it just me or is the relation between this variable and
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 05:32, Bastien wrote:
> I think these are improvements going in the right direction -- let me
> know what you think. On the overall, I'm with Nicolas in thinking that
> we need to be extra careful when we try to extend a functionality to
> heterogeneous elements.
Bastien,
Olivier Schwander writes:
> * Garden
> ** TODO Cut the flowers
> * Home
> ** TODO Cut the flowers
Tagging the parent should work, I think.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
* House :HOUSE:
** TODO Cut t
Hi John,
John Wiegley writes:
> Hi all, I'm considering switching my lengthy .emacs over to a literate Org
> file, using ob-tangle, and as I was wondering if others had any experience
> with this, and if so, does it slow down startup much?
The first load after a .org file is changed will requir
Dear Seb,
At Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:09:24 +0200,
Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>
> Hi Marko,
>
> Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote:
> > I have tried to use BEAMER_FRAME_LEVEL instead of setting specific
> > sections/environments for the individual levels. If I remove all
> > entries from the sectioning part of
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Eric Schulte wrote:
Hi Chuck,
I just pushed up another fix, after which your example exports cleanly
on my system. Please give this another try and let me know if it is now
working for you as well.
Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.170.gcaaad.dirty) works fine on the
ex
> I have made a decision not to merge org-lparse, org-xhtml & org-odt in
> to Orgmode core. It is a very difficult decision for me to take
> considering that I had put all my heart in to it. (Btw, this decision
> has nothing to with me not having enough time at hand.)
>
> I leave it up to the
I've been using the Emacs starter kit for some time and I must say it is
excellent. Before making the change, I already had my Emacs initialization
broken-down into smaller .el files that were loaded by the master file. It
was as much organized as I could be, but not enough. It always required
mor
Bastien writes:
> Hi Reiner,
>
> Reiner Steib writes:
>
>> (a) There is no (interactive) command to toggle this setting.
>
> There is now `org-toggle-link-display'.
>
>> #+BEGIN_SRC lisp
>>(defun org-descriptive-links ()
>> "Display Descriptive Links in `org-mode'."
>> (interactive
Am 21.08.2011 14:32, schrieb Philip Rooke:
Marc-Oliver Ihm writes:
By the way: There are surely official documentation standards, that I
could adhere for this. However, at present I cannot find them. Could
anyone provide me a pointer please ?
Does the file doc/Documentation_Standards.org in
"Charles C. Berry" writes:
> And I get
>
> [...]
> Code block evaluation complete.
> if: Args out of range: -1, -1
I have updated to latest Emacs bzr and org-git. Starting emacs with the
-q flag and trying the simple example src_R{1+1} I get the above error
when I use org-babel-exp-inline-src-bl
Rasmus writes:
> "Charles C. Berry" writes:
>
>> And I get
>>
>> [...]
>> Code block evaluation complete.
>> if: Args out of range: -1, -1
>
> I have updated to latest Emacs bzr and org-git. Starting emacs with the
> -q flag and trying the simple example src_R{1+1} I get the above error
> when I
Hi Eric
2011/8/20 Eric Schulte :
> [...] I would lean towards thinking
> that passing along error messages is more important than returning error
> codes, but if the community thinks differently I'm happy to change the
> ob-sh behavior.
A non-zero exit status and stderr of a process are not neces
34 matches
Mail list logo
