> "Bernt" == Bernt Hansen writes:
Bernt> Hi Frederic,
Bernt> So does this mean it's fixed in origin/master but broken in
Bernt> release_7.5? Is your original task in the same file as the
Bernt> target of your capture?
Yes, it is.
Bernt> There were a few fixes to the co
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Jambunathan K writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> I think one of the reasons Org is so popular it is that it is a
>> common-man's swiss army knife and not a elitist samurai sword.
>
> And I think this is a very important analogy. Org does a good job for
> many (very different) tasks.
Matt Lundin writes:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> Jambunathan K writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I think one of the reasons Org is so popular it is that it is a
>>> common-man's swiss army knife and not a elitist samurai sword.
>>
>> And I think this is a very important analogy. Org does a good job fo
what happen to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ? we need it back please!!! why it
does not work
By the way nobody responded to my message!!!
http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg40104.html
why? is it a stupid question or it can't be implemented?
Regards
katepano
Hi Nick and al.,
Nick Dokos wrote:
>> This will at least help with the first difficulty -- and motivate all
>> people working on the exporters to address the second one. The third one
>> can be turned into a *chance*: that of having several people working in the
>> same direction.
>
> Excellent pl
* http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/WinnerMode gives:
"The problem with (windmove-default-keybindings) is that they clash
with the more common use on modern systems of S-right etc for
selecting text. In Emacs this is turned on by CuaMode for example.
Therefore it might be better to go with the altern
Hi Brian,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:57:30 -0400
brian powell wrote:
> * http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/WinnerMode gives:
>
I am a little confused, aren't windmove and winner mode different
packages? I use both, but I narrowed down the problem to just
winner-mode.
> "The problem with (windmove-def
Hello everyone!
Have a file like this:
#+OPTIONS:H:3 num:nil toc:2 \n:nil @:t ::t |:t ^:{} -:t f:t *:t TeX:t
LaTeX:t skip:t d:(HIDE) tags:not-in-toc
#+BABEL: :exports both :session *R* :cache no
#+TBLNAME: Chuah07
| condition | Mean.offer |
|
Hi Jambunathan,
Jambunathan K writes:
> Matt Lundin writes:
>
>> I agree that the org-exporter currently does its job very well. The
>> astounding utility of org-mode is ample proof of the value of releasing
>> early; even if the exporter is not as elegant as a modern compiler, it
>> works. :)
IIRC org-add-note works in a way that is unexpected. I think it makes
its actions happen after the command itself. I got bitten by that for
something else; maybe it is related here.
Samuel
--
The Kafka Pandemic:
http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2010/12/welcome-to-kafka-pandemic-two-forc
Sébastien Vauban wrote:
> Hi Nick and al.,
>
> Nick Dokos wrote:
> >> This will at least help with the first difficulty -- and motivate all
> >> people working on the exporters to address the second one. The third one
> >> can be turned into a *chance*: that of having several people working in t
Matt Lundin wrote:
> Hi Jambunathan,
>
> Jambunathan K writes:
>
> > Matt Lundin writes:
> >
> >> I agree that the org-exporter currently does its job very well. The
> >> astounding utility of org-mode is ample proof of the value of releasing
> >> early; even if the exporter is not as elegant
Vitalie Spinu writes:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Have a file like this:
>
> #+OPTIONS:H:3 num:nil toc:2 \n:nil @:t ::t |:t ^:{} -:t f:t *:t TeX:t
> LaTeX:t skip:t d:(HIDE) tags:not-in-toc
> #+BABEL: :exports both :session *R* :cache no
> #+TBLNAME: Chu
katepano wrote:
> what happen to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ? we need it back please!!!
Why? what's the use case?
> why it
> does not work
>
> By the way nobody responded to my message!!!
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg40104.html
>
> why? is it a stupid question or it
katepano writes:
> what happen to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ? we need it back please!!! why it
> does not work
Something happened to it? This feature was not removed intentionally.
I don't use this feature so I can't verify if it works or not without
more information.
Please provide an example o
Bernt Hansen wrote:
> katepano writes:
>
> > what happen to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ? we need it back please!!! why it
> > does not work
>
> Something happened to it? This feature was not removed intentionally.
> I don't use this feature so I can't verify if it works or not without
> more inf
Bernt Hansen writes:
> katepano writes:
>
>> what happen to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ? we need it back please!!! why it
>> does not work
>
> Something happened to it? This feature was not removed intentionally.
Actually I stand corrected. Carsten added the "DOES NOT WORK" text to
the info manu
On 4.4.2011, at 19:57, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>> katepano writes:
>>
>>> what happen to the #+OPTIONS: \n:t ? we need it back please!!! why it
>>> does not work
>>
>> Something happened to it? This feature was not removed intentionally.
>> I don't use this feature so
At Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:43:06 -0400,
Buck Brody wrote:
> Is there a way to use capture to create new files? Can I fill out
> the name of the file, and add a date stamp, from within the capture
> template?
Prompting in the templates happens after the template is placed in the
target buffer. So AFAI
At Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:06:52 +0200,
Michael Heerdegen wrote:
>
>
> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
>
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
>
> Your bug report will be
Could one not have it go into a temporary file and then have an exit
hook attatched to a particular template that if a particular property
had been filled in that it would create a new file with that name and
either refile to or cut to and then paste from the kill ring?
Matthew
obviously would re
Appended is a patch with a couple of small changes to org-taskjuggler.el,
addressing the following issues:
General:
* in org-taskjuggler-open-project, the duration is never calculated (default is
always used).
Specific to tj3:
* the reports need a "formats" attribute
* tj3 does not support t
* lisp/org-agenda.el: Remove obsolete code for adding todo list in front
of the agenda
Todo lists should be built with the TODO list or a block agenda instead.
This code was triggered for C-u R in block agendas which is used to
limit the clock report to the current tags filter applied to the
agen
Tom gmail.com> writes:
>
> Bottom line: the problem does not occur in the English locale,
> because there all day abbreviations are 3 chars long, so the
> above described simple way of restoring the cursor position
> always works. But this is not true for all locales, so org
> shouldn't rely on t
Hullo,
2011/4/4 Sébastien Vauban :
> [snip]
>
> When discussing exporters and features, two things that come up to my mind as
> missing as a "general Org feature":
>
> - bibliography :: works for LaTeX[1], not for HTML export.
> - acronyms :: idem.
>
> Maybe those should be made available for gene
Reading the manual, I found myself needing a single page version which
I found after a quick search, I noticed that org mode manual is
offered in several formats but not as much as emacs'[1]., which made
me wonder if there is a org manual plain text version that can be
downloaded somewhere.
I also
[forgot to cc: the list]
Izzie wrote:
> Reading the manual, I found myself needing a single page version which
> I found after a quick search, I noticed that org mode manual is
> offered in several formats but not as much as emacs'[1]., which made
> me wonder if there is a org manual plain text
Hi Katepano,
katepano writes:
> By the way nobody responded to my message!!!
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg40104.html
Please be patient -- I have been busier than expected lately and
I could not read/reply all emails. If nobody else replied to it,
it doesn't mean it'
28 matches
Mail list logo
