Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote: > Hi Nick and al., > > Nick Dokos wrote: > >> This will at least help with the first difficulty -- and motivate all > >> people working on the exporters to address the second one. The third one > >> can be turned into a *chance*: that of having several people working in the > >> same direction. > > > > Excellent plan! > > > > If nobody beats me to it, I'll send out an initial draft of such a table to > > the list for comment over the weekend: not a complete thing, mind you - just > > something partially covering one or two exporters. We can modify it as > > necessary and then proceed to populate it over the next few weeks. >
BTW, I got buried last week and at least through this one, so not much progress. It might go faster if somebody does beat me to it. Thanks, Nick > When discussing exporters and features, two things that come up to my mind as > missing as a "general Org feature": > > - bibliography :: works for LaTeX[1], not for HTML export. > - acronyms :: idem. > > Maybe those should be made available for general Org usage by making them > somehow part of the preprocessing? > > Best regards, > Seb > > Footnotes: > > [1] ... but "uglyfies" a bit (too much) the *visible* text. Ideally, such > features should be hidden behind things like links or so. > -- > Sébastien Vauban > >
