Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this happens because the command needs a variable that is set
> by the post-command-hook in the agenda buffer. Normally you are
> issuing a command to get to the buffer, so the hook is run. However,
> in your case no command has been called yet.
>
>
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So far I cannot reproduce this problem. One helpful thing would be to
> post
> a full backtrace, made with uncompiled org.el that will tell me exactly
> which function tries to use an undefined marker.
How do I generate a debug backtrace again? I tr
Bernt Hansen said unto the world upon 21/01/08 08:32 AM:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So far I cannot reproduce this problem. One helpful thing would be to
post
a full backtrace, made with uncompiled org.el that will tell me exactly
which function tries to use an undefined marke
Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So far I cannot reproduce this problem. One helpful thing would be to
>> post
>> a full backtrace, made with uncompiled org.el that will tell me exactly
>> which function tries to use an undefined marker.
Hi
I am curious why I never got any feedback on this implementation
of task dependencies. Did people overlook this? Or is the need
for dependencies not as pressing as some of you thought?
- Carsten
On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Oct 11, 2007, at 16:46, Carsten Domini
On Jan 18, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Erik Colson wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking about moving from planner to org-mode. Particularly for
the outline and better file formatting.
I've been reading through the doc and I'm missing a feature of
planner. In planner we can create a todo which can be bound to
m
Hi Adam and all others
From time to time my emails don't reach the list. Maybe I made a
mistake and sent my answer to Adam personally this afternoon.
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your request is right on the money; in fact Bastien's already ahead of
> you -
>
> http://search.gmane.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am curious why I never got any feedback on this implementation
> of task dependencies. Did people overlook this? Or is the need
> for dependencies not as pressing as some of you thought?
I guess maybe not. Or maybe we
On Jan 21, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi
I am curious why I never got any feedback on this implementation
of task dependencies. Did people overlook this? Or is the need
for dependencies not as pressing as some of you
Hello!
I'm getting to the point of actually using org for organization (as
opposed to using it for note taking and publishing and procrastination).
Currently, when a repeated task is marked as done, it shows up again in
the agenda on the date of the next occurrence of the task as long as the
task
Phil Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> How about writing a little extension org-irc.el that extends the link
>> mechanism for both cases? I'd love to see more such extensions, and I
>> would be happy to distribute them with Org-mode, and to put them into
>> Emacs if the papers are in o
11 matches
Mail list logo
