On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:22, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
Once again, it hit reply instead of reply-all.
Edd
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eddward DeVilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 18, 2007 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Feature in org-move-item-down
To: Mike Newman <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hey, folks:
I've also been using org-mode with longlines-mode, and had noticed
that the two occasionally conflict. I've just developed workarounds
for the bugs that affect me, mostly inserting extra carriage returns
here and there to ensure the right line breaks for org-mode. Carsten,
if
Carsten Dominik wrote:
No, this does not work. Could be done, of course, but adds complexity,
and I am sure once it is there, people will want to switch
TODO keywords constantly, filling the entire file with new #+TODO
statements. Does not feel right.
How about the following alternative:
J
On 2007-03-18, Carsten Dominik said:
> On Mar 16, 2007, at 18:38, Leo wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Put the following line in a buffer:
>> [[http://www.google.com][Musick is wrong]]
>>
>> then enable org-mode and flyspell-mode. Now right click on the word
>> "Musick" and you can see the behavior o
Dear all,
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:08:33 -0400, Carsten Dominik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Exporting text before the first heading ?
It seems that text before the first heading is not exported. Using
#+TEXT: might help, but #+TEXT: does not understand links. Is that
intentional ?
Hello all,
When using the #+TEXT:, #+HTML:, or #BEGIN_HTML...#END_HTML directives to
output literal html fragments, the resulting markup is enclosed in a
paragraph with and tags. Whenever I need something else, I am
forced to inhibit their generation in clumsy ways, "cancelling out" the
Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can see that my suggestion would add complexity in both code and org
> files. Supporting multiple DONE states would be a nice, especially if
> they integrate properly with the agenda.
Maybe we could use the same grouping conventions than for tags :
Bastien wrote:
Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I can see that my suggestion would add complexity in both code and org
files. Supporting multiple DONE states would be a nice, especially if
they integrate properly with the agenda.
Maybe we could use the same grouping conventions than