Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 22, 2006, at 2:39, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
>
>> ... but I don't know one aspect of Org that I hope is maintained.
>> It's really flexible. Kind of like perl. It has a lot of little
>> nifty features that you can use to manage and organize infor
On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:21, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
I'm wondering if you could absorb all the nifty features from
emacs-muse or planner, etc. Especially various export formats and
more text markups?
In this generality: no.
The focus of muse is publishing, and that is not the focus of org-mode.
On 10/23/06, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 22, 2006, at 2:39, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> ... but I don't know one aspect of Org that I hope is maintained.
> It's really flexible. Kind of like perl. It has a lot of little
wow. Can you tell I was sleep deprived. I *do* kno
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:21, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering if you could absorb all the nifty features from
>> emacs-muse or planner, etc. Especially various export formats and
>> more text markups?
>
> In this generality: no.
>
> The focus of m
