Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 22, 2006, at 2:39, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
>
>> ... but I don't know one aspect of Org that I hope is maintained.
>> It's really flexible. Kind of like perl. It has a lot of little
>> nifty features that you can use to manage and organize information (to
>> tasks, or whatever) and use can use any subset you want. You can
>> learn it incrementally. (...as I have. It sound popular but I
>> haven't even touched the publishing...) None of the features really
>> require the use of any other feature except maybe agenda and agenda is
>> just a flexible interface for gathering the information marked and
>> managed by the other features. (Dates, tags, Todo state...) Yet all
>> of the features work well together. There's more that one way to do
>> most things.
>
> I am smiling happily at this description, it reflects very much of
> what I am trying to do with org-mode.
>
> - Carsten
I'm wondering if you could absorb all the nifty features from
emacs-muse or planner, etc. Especially various export formats and
more text markups?
Xiao-Yong
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
