On Sunday, 27 Feb 2022 at 10:38, Henrik Frisk wrote:
> I see. Didn't realize that. I will look into citar then, thanks!
citar works very well. Recommended.
--
: Eric S Fraga, with org release_9.5.2-386-g77d942 in Emacs 29.0.50
Den lör 26 feb. 2022 kl 16:11 skrev John Kitchin :
> I would not recommend org-ref-cite (
> https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref-cite). It was an early approach to
> trying to integrate org-ref with oc-cite. As far as I know, it worked fine
> for that, and was pretty complete for citations, but I h
I would not recommend org-ref-cite (https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref-cite).
It was an early approach to trying to integrate org-ref with oc-cite. As
far as I know, it worked fine for that, and was pretty complete for
citations, but I have abandoned this approach and archived the repo. If
anyone
Den fre 25 feb. 2022 kl 13:56 skrev Eric S Fraga :
> On Friday, 25 Feb 2022 at 08:50, Henrik Frisk wrote:
> > The only thing I can't seem to sort out is to change the style of the
> > citation. Regardless where I do it I get the error "Wrong type
> > argument: org-cite-processor,"
>
> It would hel
On Friday, 25 Feb 2022 at 08:50, Henrik Frisk wrote:
> The only thing I can't seem to sort out is to change the style of the
> citation. Regardless where I do it I get the error "Wrong type
> argument: org-cite-processor,"
It would help if you could post a minimal example.
>
> Another question: i
Hello,
Henrik Frisk writes:
> I have now finally got around to changing my setup to org-cte. It works
> really well! The only thing I can't seem to sort out is to change the style
> of the citation. Regardless where I do it I get the error "Wrong type
> argument: org-cite-processor,"
>
> Anothe
Hi,
I have now finally got around to changing my setup to org-cte. It works
really well! The only thing I can't seem to sort out is to change the style
of the citation. Regardless where I do it I get the error "Wrong type
argument: org-cite-processor,"
Another question: if I would like to export
Great, thanks! I can confirm it works now. Once again thank you very much.
Best regards,
Elias
Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 14:44 Uhr schrieb Nicolas Goaziou <
m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
> > This allows one to insert a citation in the middle of the citation
> > number, which
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> This allows one to insert a citation in the middle of the citation
> number, which is not desirable either. IOW, an additional check is
> required.
I think this is now fixed. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hello,
Elias Bounatirou writes:
> I have looked at the problem that citations cannot be inserted as 1st items
> in footnotes once again more closely. It has become obvious for me that
> this is indeed a bug of org-cite or rather a default setting which was
> deliberately introduced, although it
I have looked at the problem that citations cannot be inserted as 1st items
in footnotes once again more closely. It has become obvious for me that
this is indeed a bug of org-cite or rather a default setting which was
deliberately introduced, although it is not really user-friendly or
practical to
Elias - do you mean org-cite-insert won't allow this?
[fn:1] [cite:@doe2019].
If yes, I don't see that; it inserts fine.
I'm using bibtex-actions for the insert processor, but I don't think
that should make any difference, since it's org-cite that's handling
that.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 4:23 P
Hi,
When I try to insert a citation as the first item into a
non-inline-definition footnote, org-ref-cite refuses to insert the citation
returning in the minibuffer "Cannot insert citation here". The same problem
does not occur if the footnote has an inline definition. As for
non-inline-definition
13 matches
Mail list logo
