Re: Table width cookies become part of data table in R

2024-12-22 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Tentatively, I am leaning towards restoring the old behavior for the > time being, until we can come up with something better. > > Patch attached. Applied, onto main. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=c93ddd23bf -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar

Re: Table width cookies become part of data table in R

2024-12-16 Thread William Denton
Sorry to confuse the threading, but I wanted to bring this back up given Ihor and Suhail Singh talking about this change in R behaviour. I agree it seems best to revert to the earlier was of handling data tables in R until, if possible, there is a nice way to clean up all the languages at once.

Re: Table width cookies become part of data table in R

2024-12-14 Thread Suhail Singh
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Tentatively, I am leaning towards restoring the old behavior for the > time being, until we can come up with something better. I think doing so is prudent. Further, I think it would help if the manner in which special rows are handled were user-configurable. Once we ha

Re: Table width cookies become part of data table in R

2024-12-14 Thread Ihor Radchenko
William Denton writes: > Up until recently, width cookies were ignored when reading a table into an R > code block as data. For example, take this test table: > > #+name: test_table > | Date | Weather | > | <10> | <50> | > |+-

Re: Table width cookies become part of data table in R

2024-11-15 Thread William Denton
On Friday, November 15th, 2024 at 06:59, Rens Oliemans wrote: > According to git bisect, the first bad commit is: > [e0924db3c55a44c8aa8d126fbb9b42cfc54f104c] orgtbl-to-generic: Retain special > rows in code block table output Aha! Thank you. I wasn't looking at tables generally. I see now

Re: Table width cookies become part of data table in R

2024-11-15 Thread Rens Oliemans
William Denton writes: > Up until recently, width cookies were ignored when reading a table into an R > code block as data. According to git bisect, the first bad commit is: [e0924db3c55a44c8aa8d126fbb9b42cfc54f104c] orgtbl-to-generic: Retain special rows in code block table output Rens