Ihor Radchenko writes:
"Thomas S. Dye" writes:
I pushed Forth documentation to the Worg repo,
Thanks!
I have 2 comments:
+Babel evaluates Forth code blocks in an inferior Forth
process.
+You can start an inferior Forth process with =M-x run-forth=.
Does it mean that users _must_ run M
"Thomas S. Dye" writes:
> I pushed Forth documentation to the Worg repo,
Thanks!
I have 2 comments:
> +Babel evaluates Forth code blocks in an inferior Forth process.
> +You can start an inferior Forth process with =M-x run-forth=.
Does it mean that users _must_ run M-x run-forth? Otherwise, I
Aloha Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
It is honestly not our job to fix such things. I suggest
emphasizing
that ob-forth expects forth-mode distributed officially.
I pushed Forth documentation to the Worg repo, but saw a build
error that I don't know how to fix.
Let me know if you have ques
Aloha Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
"Thomas S. Dye" writes:
My hunch is that the ext: part of ext:gforth expects that
forth-mode is setup to use the forth-mode distributed with
GForth.
Yes. Our policy is to support the official distribution when
possible. Supporting non-standard packages
"Thomas S. Dye" writes:
> My hunch is that the ext: part of ext:gforth expects that
> forth-mode is setup to use the forth-mode distributed with GForth.
Yes. Our policy is to support the official distribution when
possible. Supporting non-standard packages is optional.
> Spacemacs appears to
"Thomas S. Dye" writes:
> It does not (require 'gforth), but strangely (to me) requires
> org-macs twice.
>
> Perhaps ob-forth.el is broken?
No. gforth.el "provides" forth-mode feature, which we do require.
Everything should be fine in this regard.
See https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gforth.
Joost Kremers writes:
The `declare-function` call says that `forth-proc` can be found
in
`gforth.el`, so the fact that you have `forth-mode.el` installed
is
(probably) irrelevant. What you need is the file `gforth.el`.
Where it
comes from is irrelevant, it just needs to be on Emacs'
`load-pa
On Thu, Jan 23 2025, Joost Kremers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22 2025, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>> What is the best way forward here?
>
> What does the documentation for `ob-forth.el` say? Does it say `gforth.el`
> needs to be installed? Otherwise perhaps ask the Org mailing list
Oh, silly me, this *is* the
On Wed, Jan 22 2025, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Aloha all,
>
> I'm drafting ob-doc-forth.org and haven't been able to get ob-forth.el to
> recognize a working GForth in Spacemacs. I get "Symbol's function
> definition is void: forth-proc" when I evaluate a Forth source block.
>
> In ob-forth.el there
