On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:33:14 +0200
Jan Böcker wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 08:32 AM, Typhoon wrote:
> >
> > Yes, thanks. I was using f:nil but what I would really like is to
> > disable [1] type footnotes while retaining the [fn:1] style.
> >
> > Nice trick on the zero-space - That would be OK, I sup
On 07/31/2010 08:32 AM, Typhoon wrote:
>
> Yes, thanks. I was using f:nil but what I would really like is to
> disable [1] type footnotes while retaining the [fn:1] style.
>
> Nice trick on the zero-space - That would be OK, I suppose, but like
> you say, a bit tedious after a while.
>
Alright,
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:27:50 +0200
Jan Böcker wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 05:17 AM, Typhoon wrote:
> > I write legal texts and often need to reference case law like this:
> >
> > /Pyke v The Hibernian Bank Limited/ [1950] IR 195
> >
> > Obviously, I don't want the [1950] to be a footnote. What do I
On 07/31/2010 05:17 AM, Typhoon wrote:
> I write legal texts and often need to reference case law like this:
>
> /Pyke v The Hibernian Bank Limited/ [1950] IR 195
>
> Obviously, I don't want the [1950] to be a footnote. What do I do?
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
Hi Alan,
you can add the following lin
On 2010-04-16, Dan Davison wrote:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>
>> Here are 2 test cases for footnotes. Perhaps they can be put in a
>> test directory somewhere if they are useful.
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Thanks. You have obviously thought about this a lot more carefully than
> me. Is there any chance you
Samuel Wales writes:
> Here are 2 test cases for footnotes. Perhaps they can be put in a
> test directory somewhere if they are useful.
Hi Samuel,
Thanks. You have obviously thought about this a lot more carefully than
me. Is there any chance you could run your test files with Carsten's
patch,
Here are 2 test cases for footnotes. Perhaps they can be put in a
test directory somewhere if they are useful.
My old relatively thorough test case with 11 specific documented
points to test for:
http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg10877.html
And my recent one, sloppily put tog
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Dan,
>
> have you given this patch any serious testing, and do you have
> any remarks about it?
Hi Carsten,
I hadn't forgotten about this but I have been conscious that I wasn't
giving it the testing it deserved. I don't export with footnotes that
much, and when I d
Hi Carsten,
Thanks for reply.
By the way, for quite some time now for health reasons I have not been
able to deal with email much or contribute to org or polish my large
backlog of ideas or be detailed or do anything else. Apologies if I
have neglected anything important.
Here is a brief respon
Hi Dan,
have you given this patch any serious testing, and do you have
any remarks about it?
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:37 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
If you hit on a footnote definition, it indents it away from
column 1, to a
Hi Samuel,
On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
(setf org-footnote-auto-label 'confirm)
(setf org-footnote-section nil)
* top
*** an article
sadfkaj sdnfklaj nsfklandsf
asd flkajnd sfa
*** an article. exporting this to ascii does not export anonymous
footnotes
I sometimes[fn:3]
Aloha Chao,
The Org-mode manual is really helpful for these kinds of questions.
Also, there are several useful tutorials and other materials on Worg:
http://orgmode.org/worg/
If after consulting these sources you are still having problems, then
one of the many Org-mode wizards on this list w
On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:37 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
If you hit on a footnote definition, it indents it away from
column 1, to align with its heading. However, the footnote definition
needs to start in column 1 in order for the footnote to be correctly
exported. It would be nice if the footnote ex
Hi Eraldo,
I believe this is fixed, now, please verify.
- Carsten
On Dec 16, 2009, at 7:00 PM, Eraldo Helal wrote:
Org-mode source file:
- OSD[fn:OSD]
- OSD[fn:OSD]
...
[fn:OSD] OSD: "open source definition"
Resulting PDF:
• OSD¹
• OSD$^1$
...
---
¹OSD: "open
Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
> -- Gio 29/10/09, Andreas Roehler ha scritto:
>> when inserting a footnote between [fn:1] and [fn:2]
>> it's not renumbered at place. Got [fn:1], [fn:3] and
>> [fn:2].
>>
>> Think mentioned that already and answer was it should
>> be a feature. Isn't it a bug indeed?
>
>
-- Gio 29/10/09, Andreas Roehler ha scritto:
> when inserting a footnote between [fn:1] and [fn:2]
> it's not renumbered at place. Got [fn:1], [fn:3] and
> [fn:2].
>
> Think mentioned that already and answer was it should
> be a feature. Isn't it a bug indeed?
It's a *feature*!.
did you activat
Verified, thanks.
2009/9/3 Carsten Dominik :
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I think this is fixed now, please verify.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Carsten
>
> On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
>
>> Emacs : GNU Emacs 22.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll
>> bars)
>> of 2008-05-02 on kin
Hi Andrew,
I think this is fixed now, please verify.
Thanks!
- Carsten
On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
Emacs : GNU Emacs 22.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d
scroll bars)
of 2008-05-02 on king, modified by Ubuntu
Package: Org-mode version 6.30
current stat
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after reopening a file with two footnotes inside,
>> inserting a third footnote between first and second, it
>> fails to renumber it.
>>
>> below the test-buffer
>>
>> Should I'm right so far --even se
On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote:
Hi,
after reopening a file with two footnotes inside,
inserting a third footnote between first and second, it
fails to renumber it.
below the test-buffer
Should I'm right so far --even seeing footnote reimplemented-- maybe
have a look at
Karl Maihofer wrote:
> Andreas Roehler schrieb:
>
>> after reopening a file with two footnotes inside,
>> inserting a third footnote between first and second, it
>> fails to renumber it.
>>
>
> Did you try the new "C-u C-c C-x f S" feature of the latest git-version?
>
No. Just check th
Andreas Roehler schrieb:
> after reopening a file with two footnotes inside,
> inserting a third footnote between first and second, it
> fails to renumber it.
Did you try the new "C-u C-c C-x f S" feature of the latest git-version?
Org does not renumber footnotes automatically when they are insert
> Hi Samuel,
>
> does it make a noticeable difference when you turn off
> org-use-tag-inheritance ?
Only slightly. (And I use inheritance.)
--
Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early;
Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other
diseases studi
On Apr 2, 2009, at 7:53 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
Hi Carsten,
I figured that you had already optimized the agenda quite a lot and
that there probably wasn't much that could be done, so I suggested the
only thing that seemed like it might be fast and would not be too
brittle. I didn't realize th
Hi Carsten,
I figured that you had already optimized the agenda quite a lot and
that there probably wasn't much that could be done, so I suggested the
only thing that seemed like it might be fast and would not be too
brittle. I didn't realize the code would need to be rewritten.
For me, everythi
Hi Samuel,
caching stuff for the agenda would mean rewriting the agenda code.
Do you have more detailed pointers what operations exactly are slow?
Maybe we can profile and improve these without resorting to cacheing.
- Carsten
On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:21 PM, Samuel Wales wrote:
The following so
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 09:38, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Can you create an example to illustrate the problem?
This test case illustrates some issues with footnotes (apparent bugs,
things to watch out for when making future changes, and desirable
features that Carsten might or might not want to imp
On Jan 31, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
Hi Carsten,
\\ would work OK for me, but perhaps there is a solution even without
it. Useful because \\ does not fill correctly, in my filladapt setup,
at least.
Hi Samuel,
maybe you missed this in a different message: The best is to
use "\
Hi Carsten,
\\ would work OK for me, but perhaps there is a solution even without
it. Useful because \\ does not fill correctly, in my filladapt setup,
at least.
I am likely to use footnotes in one of 2 ways: the document is the
body of a single entry, in which case I want footnotes at the end o
For now, \par in a footnote is translated into starting a new line.
For me this is good enough, unless people give good reasons why not.
I can see that wrapping each footnote into an extra div could make
sense,
but so far I don't know anybody who wants to make use of this
extra structure elemen
> For LaTeX export, you can simply write \par to create
> a new paragraph inside a footnote.
Super.
Scot
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
I suggest that each footnote is placed in a with class footnote,
with all footnotes nested inside a with class footnotes.
--
Mike
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:46:02 +0100
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
>
> > Minor questions:
> >
> > Is there a way to
On Jan 24, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
Minor questions:
Is there a way to have footnotes that have more than one paragraph?
For me, they are not recognized as footnotes.
How would I format a multi-paragraph footnote in HTML?
Right now we have:
(div id="footnotes">
Footnotes:
1
On Jan 25, 2009, at 12:55 AM, Scot Becker wrote:
I also would make good use of multi-paragraph footnotes. Since I my
final work is exported to LaTeX, I could insert a LaTeX footnote
when needed if support for multi-paragraph footnotes in org proves
too difficult to add.
For LaTeX export
I also would make good use of multi-paragraph footnotes. Since I my final
work is exported to LaTeX, I could insert a LaTeX footnote when needed if
support for multi-paragraph footnotes in org proves too difficult to add.
Scot
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Jan
On Jan 24, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
Minor questions:
Is there a way to have footnotes that have more than one paragraph?
For me, they are not recognized as footnotes.
Yes, Footnotes in Org are single paragraph. Maybe this could be
changed, if enough people claim they need this.
36 matches
Mail list logo
