When I was selecting a VC, I narrowed it down to Bazaar or Git. Being
a prior Arch user, Bazaar fixed most of my complaints while using the
same architecture.
I understand Git's got quite a following, and addresses many of the
same shortcomings of CVS that Bazaar and other distributed VC's
(darcs,
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:01:13AM -0600, Russell Adams wrote:
>> I'm a bazaar fan myself. I'd be curious if someone can point out where
>> git is superior. ;]
>
> I can't remember the details, but I'm pretty sure that I saw reference
> to issues with the
I use mercurial just because it's supposed to work better with windows
(work).
-Hugo
On Jan 31, 2008 1:34 PM, Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:39:50PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> >
> > >Carsten Dominik <[E
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:39:50PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
> >Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>I am considering the idea to move the org development to a public
> >>git repository.
This would be superb!
> >>This is not y
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:01:13AM -0600, Russell Adams wrote:
> I'm a bazaar fan myself. I'd be curious if someone can point out where
> git is superior. ;]
I can't remember the details, but I'm pretty sure that I saw reference
to issues with the design of the underlying backend. The most obviou
I'm a bazaar fan myself. I'd be curious if someone can point out where
git is superior. ;]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:39:50PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
> >Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>I am considering the idea to m
