Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:01:13AM -0600, Russell Adams wrote: >> I'm a bazaar fan myself. I'd be curious if someone can point out where >> git is superior. ;] > > I can't remember the details, but I'm pretty sure that I saw reference > to issues with the design of the underlying backend. The most obvious > symptom of this would be the performance difference - git is > well-known to cream pretty much everything except mercurial (which > IIRC has a very similar design, minus the object packing). > > But I'm sure some quick googling would tell you a lot more than my > hazy memories do :-)
FYI Eric S. Raymond is working on a paper where all dVCS systems will be compared. The Emacs dev team is waiting for his conclusions in order to decide what system should be used instead of the actual CVS. But there is more to consider than technical benchmarks since RMS also insist on preferring a tool that is part of the GNU project. Of course this doesn't affect the choice of a tool for Org, and git sounds like a good one to me. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
