Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-31 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31/03/11 05:40, Eric Schulte wrote: > Suvayu Ali writes: > >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:42:19 -0600 >> "Eric Schulte" wrote: >> This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch which introduces new features and run af

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread Eric Schulte
Suvayu Ali writes: > On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:42:19 -0600 > "Eric Schulte" wrote: > >> > >> > This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch >> > which introduces new features and run after each patch. >> > >> >> Agreed, in a perfect world... >> >> > >> > So is it only neces

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:42:19 -0600 "Eric Schulte" wrote: > > > > This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch > > which introduces new features and run after each patch. > > > > Agreed, in a perfect world... > > > > > So is it only necessary to add meat to this framework?

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread Eric Schulte
Rainer M Krug writes: > On 30/03/11 16:18, Christian Egli wrote: >> Rainer M Krug writes: >> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnitTesting >>> >>> Am I right in assuming, that all of the possible test frameworks would >>> require org files and the expected output (tengle, export to ..., >>> a

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread Eric Schulte
Aankhen writes: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 20:43, Manuel Giraud > wrote: >> Rainer M Krug writes: >> [snip] >> >>> Please correct me if I am missing something. >>> >>> This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch which >>> introduces new features and run after each patch. >>

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread Aankhen
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 20:43, Manuel Giraud wrote: > Rainer M Krug writes: > [snip] > >> Please correct me if I am missing something. >> >> This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch which >> introduces new features and run after each patch. > > Which renders this framewor

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread Manuel Giraud
Rainer M Krug writes: > But it does not look as if it is used very often... There are not many > test org files, and I did not se anything which compares the resulting > exported / tangle file with an expected output? It could be useful to have this kind of framework for org but I think it is d

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/03/11 16:18, Christian Egli wrote: > Rainer M Krug writes: > >>> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnitTesting >> >> Am I right in assuming, that all of the possible test frameworks would >> require org files and the expected output (tengle, expor

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
As a heavy Perl user, writing /automated/ tests is a large part of my dev work. I would suggest / plea / encourage that whatever framework is used can be automated. If it cannot be run as part of an automated process it is not going to be run. Also consider a set of testing platforms (emacs ve

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/03/11 16:11, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> On 30/03/11 15:46, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote: >>> Hi I was bitten again from an unintended regression i

Re: [O] Re: Test framework needed

2011-03-30 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/03/11 15:46, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I was bitten again from an unintended regression in org-mode, and that >> the second time in two weeks. >> >> I am probably not the right person to sug