-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 30/03/11 16:18, Christian Egli wrote: > Rainer M Krug <r.m.k...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnitTesting >> >> Am I right in assuming, that all of the possible test frameworks would >> require org files and the expected output (tengle, export to ..., >> agenda, ...)? In this case, would it make sense to start collecting >> those, as they can easily be user contributed, consequently representing >> a cross section of the use cases (even not intended use cases)? > > Before you go too far with this; Orgmode already contains a unit test > suite. Look at the README in the testing directory > (http://orgmode.org/w/?p=org-mode.git;a=blob_plain;f=testing/README.org;hb=HEAD) >
But it does not look as if it is used very often... There are not many test org files, and I did not se anything which compares the resulting exported / tangle file with an expected output? Please correct me if I am missing something. This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch which introduces new features and run after each patch. So is it only necessary to add meat to this framework? Rainer - -- Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Natural Sciences Building Office Suite 2039 Stellenbosch University Main Campus, Merriman Avenue Stellenbosch South Africa Tel: +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +27 - (0)8 39 47 90 42 Fax (SA): +27 - (0)8 65 16 27 82 Fax (D) : +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44 Fax (FR): +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44 email: rai...@krugs.de Skype: RMkrug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2TPp4ACgkQoYgNqgF2egpBZQCfQN+g3J2+BiyKaWzh6o847mZS PR4An0aW0Di6vfgzwsJgwfK4FajL65WP =9/CW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
