Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos writes:
> But this is the second time that I have had to defend keeping the tag
> and I hope that the rest of you will sympathise with my reasons for
> keeping the tag.
Be reassured: at least I do. Hope we can move forward now.
--
Bastien
__
On 28 Feb 2011, at 18:05, Samuel Wales wrote:
[O] is *much* better than [Orgmode]. Thank you.
Looking forward to [OD] and [OB], if that's what we will use.
Plus [OS], for discussions about splitting the mailing list.
Konrad
PS: Don't worry, this is my last post on this topic!
___
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Bastien wrote:
>
> > Julien Danjou writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
> > >> I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
> > >
> > > Couldn't you just drop it?
> > >
> > > Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous.
> >
> Not t
Bastien wrote:
> Julien Danjou writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
> >> I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
> >
> > Couldn't you just drop it?
> >
> > Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous.
>
Not to me.
> No, it's useful to people who filter emails through the subject
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
> No, it's useful to people who filter emails through the subject line.
It would be better to teach these people this is not a good practice
rather than polluting the subject lines for everybody…
--
Julien Danjou
❱ http://julien.danjou.info
pgpZrRQKSf1VX.pg
Julien Danjou writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
>> I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
>
> Couldn't you just drop it?
>
> Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous.
No, it's useful to people who filter emails through the subject line.
--
Bastien
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
> I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
Couldn't you just drop it?
Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous.
--
Julien Danjou
❱ http://julien.danjou.info
pgpcuBCMMMZGw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Emacs
