Re: [PATCH] Org Refile Document RFLOC (was: Org Refile RFLOC and Struct Type)

2020-10-19 Thread Kyle Meyer
Kevin Foley writes: > My pleasure, I've attached a patch to this email. I put something > together but I wasn't sure how it should be styled/formatted so if > anyone has any suggestions I'd be happy to update it. Thanks. Looks good. Applied (2d1e2606e), tweaking the commit message to use a col

Re: [PATCH] Org Refile Document RFLOC (was: Org Refile RFLOC and Struct Type)

2020-10-18 Thread Kevin Foley
Kyle Meyer writes: > I imagine tastes vary on whether using cl-defstruct here is an overkill. > (To my eyes, it is.) More importantly, though, I think changing it now > means we'd also need a compatibility layer, which doesn't seem worth the > trouble. I tried implementing it and realized: 1.

Re: Org Refile RFLOC and Struct Type

2020-10-18 Thread Kyle Meyer
Kevin Foley writes: > I was recently working with `org-refile` and wanted to use a custom > target. There is the `rfloc` argument which is documented as: > >> RFLOC can be a refile location obtained in a different way. > > There's no documentation as to how `rfloc` should be structured. To > fig

Org Refile RFLOC and Struct Type

2020-10-13 Thread Kevin Foley
I was recently working with `org-refile` and wanted to use a custom target. There is the `rfloc` argument which is documented as: > RFLOC can be a refile location obtained in a different way. There's no documentation as to how `rfloc` should be structured. To figure that out one has to read thr