Greetings, Bastien!
On 28 March 2022 14:39, Bastien wrote:
>> I have a file with custom TODO states:
>>
>> #+TODO: FOO(f@/@) | BAR(b@/@)
>>
>> I have one item (heading) within that file that I'd like to have
>> different TODO states. Is this possible?
>
> No, and I don't think it's a good idea t
Hi Ken,
Ken Mankoff writes:
> I have a file with custom TODO states:
>
> #+TODO: FOO(f@/@) | BAR(b@/@)
>
> I have one item (heading) within that file that I'd like to have
> different TODO states. Is this possible?
No, and I don't think it's a good idea to support this.
Best,
--
Bastien
Hi Sam,
I only want one active state. I'd like the list of allowable and
short-cuttable states to be specific to one headline, different from the
file properties.
-k.
Please excuse brevity. Sent from tiny pocket computer with non-haptic
feedback keyboard.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022, 16:13 Samuel Wa
you can noly have one todo kw per heading that is meaningful to org.
you can use tags.
there are quasi-kw like archive and comment, however.
On 2/26/22, Ken Mankoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a file with custom TODO states:
>
> #+TODO: FOO(f@/@) | BAR(b@/@)
>
> I have one item (heading) within
Hello,
I have a file with custom TODO states:
#+TODO: FOO(f@/@) | BAR(b@/@)
I have one item (heading) within that file that I'd like to have different TODO
states. Is this possible?
Thanks,
-k.
