Greetings, Bastien! On 28 March 2022 14:39, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote:
>> I have a file with custom TODO states: >> >> #+TODO: FOO(f@/@) | BAR(b@/@) >> >> I have one item (heading) within that file that I'd like to have >> different TODO states. Is this possible? > > No, and I don't think it's a good idea to support this. Could you elaborate on why not? I have been in situations where having the ability to define a heading-wise TODO keyword would be useful, but I managed to get around using different ways of achieving the same end-goal. Best regards, -- João Pedro de Amorim Paula IT undergraduate at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
