Hi Tim,
Tim Cross writes:
> Perhaps we need to clarify that the supported versions is based on the
> version of Emacs which was stable at the time of release of the org
> version. For example, org 9.5, being released this week, means it would
> support Eamcs 27.x, 26.x and 25.x, but not Emacs 24
Hi Max,
Max Nikulin writes:
> lisp/org.el:;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "24.3"))
>
> Should not it be updated?
Indeed, done, thanks.
> Ubuntu-18.04 bionic is a Long Time Support release (April 2018),
> emacs-25.2.2 provided from system repository. Maybe it should be
> supported even though next
Hi Tim,
Tim Cross writes:
> Thanks Bastien. I think it is good to have a clear statement on this,
> even if not everyone agrees, as it makes things explicit. I
> suspect this will need to be reviewed after each release of a new Emacs
> version though as the effort to maintain backwards compatibi
Max Nikulin writes:
> On 28/09/2021 12:33, Bastien wrote:
>> Tim Cross writes:
>>
>>> I do think it is probably time to drop support for Emacs 24 in the next
>>> major release. However, we cannot drop it 'mid release'.
>> I've added a section called "Compatibility with Emacs versions" on
>> th
Bastien writes:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Tim Cross writes:
>
>> I do think it is probably time to drop support for Emacs 24 in the next
>> major release. However, we cannot drop it 'mid release'.
>
> I've added a section called "Compatibility with Emacs versions" on
> this page: https://orgmode.org/worg/
in debian lts stretch, which goes to June 30, 2022, there is both with
24 being the default. there are a bunch of packages made into debian
packages. idk if they work with both.
On 9/28/21, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 28/09/2021 12:33, Bastien wrote:
>> Tim Cross writes:
>>
>>> I do think it is pr
On 28/09/2021 12:33, Bastien wrote:
Tim Cross writes:
I do think it is probably time to drop support for Emacs 24 in the next
major release. However, we cannot drop it 'mid release'.
I've added a section called "Compatibility with Emacs versions" on
this page: https://orgmode.org/worg/org-mai
Hi Tim,
Tim Cross writes:
> I do think it is probably time to drop support for Emacs 24 in the next
> major release. However, we cannot drop it 'mid release'.
I've added a section called "Compatibility with Emacs versions" on
this page: https://orgmode.org/worg/org-maintenance.html
We now make
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Kyle Meyer writes:
>
>> Ah, sorry for not writing that more clearly. By the above, I wasn't
>> saying that the ones I commented on were the _only_ ones I see with
>> Emacs 24.5 on maint.
>
> I've dealt with a few more.
Thank you both very much!
--
Bastien
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Ah, sorry for not writing that more clearly. By the above, I wasn't
> saying that the ones I commented on were the _only_ ones I see with
> Emacs 24.5 on maint.
I've dealt with a few more.
* ob-C.el:477:1:Error: Unknown upattern `(quote integerp)'
Introduced by 38f87a2
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Kyle Meyer writes:
>
>> Here are a few notes on ones present in maint that I've glanced at.
>
> I confirm that there are no warning using Emacs 25.3.1 on maint.
>
> For Emacs 24.5.1, I see that following in addition to what you
> mentioned:
Ah, sorry for not writing that
Applied as commit 5f619205e with a change log in the commit message.
Thanks!
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>>> In end of data:
>>> ob-gnuplot.el:299:1:Warning: the function ‘file-local-name’ is not known to
>>> be
>
> This does not appear on maint. Only on master. The patch for master attached.
--
Bastien writes:
> could you provide a patch for these two warnings for the maint branch?
>> In end of data:
>> ob-gnuplot.el:299:1:Warning: the function ‘file-local-name’ is not known to
>> be
This does not appear on maint. Only on master. The patch for master attached.
>> In org-display-inli
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Here are a few notes on ones present in maint that I've glanced at.
I confirm that there are no warning using Emacs 25.3.1 on maint.
For Emacs 24.5.1, I see that following in addition to what you
mentioned:
Compiling /home/yantar92/Git/org-mode/lisp/ob-python.el...
Compile
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I was recently testing Org mode using old Emacs versions. Running make
> on master fails with the following errors and warnings:
Here are a few notes on ones present in maint that I've glanced at.
> Compiling /home/yantar92/Git/org-mode/lisp/ol-eww.el...
>
> In org-eww-s
Hi Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Compiling /home/yantar92/Git/org-mode/lisp/ob-gnuplot.el...
>
> In end of data:
> ob-gnuplot.el:299:1:Warning: the function ‘file-local-name’ is not known to be
> defined.
>
> Compiling /home/yantar92/Git/org-mode/lisp/org.el...
>
> In org-display-inline-ima
Hi Tim and everyone,
Tim Cross writes:
> I do think it is probably time to drop support for Emacs 24 in the next
> major release. However, we cannot drop it 'mid release'.
yes, I'm in favor of dropping support for Emacs < 25.1 for Org 9.5.
Unless Nicolas, Kyle and Jack think otherwise, I'll an
Timothy writes:
> Colin Baxter writes:
>
>> Debian 9.13 may be old but updates are still made available. While
>> Debian supports the os-version and therefore by implication emacs-24, I
>> feel org-mode shouldn't deliberately break that support.
>
> I have to admit, I'm not sure why Org suppor
> Timothy writes:
> Colin Baxter writes:
>> Debian 9.13 may be old but updates are still made
>> available. While Debian supports the os-version and therefore by
>> implication emacs-24, I feel org-mode shouldn't deliberately
>> break that support.
> I have to admi
Colin Baxter writes:
> Debian 9.13 may be old but updates are still made available. While
> Debian supports the os-version and therefore by implication emacs-24, I
> feel org-mode shouldn't deliberately break that support.
I have to admit, I'm not sure why Org support should stretch so far
bac
> Robert Horn writes:
> Colin Baxter writes:
>>> Robert Horn writes:
>>
>> > Timothy writes:
>>
>> >> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> >>
>> >> Maybe this is a good time to start a discussion about moving
>> >> Org's minimum supported Emacs to 25...?
Colin Baxter writes:
>> Robert Horn writes:
>
> > Timothy writes:
>
> >> Ihor Radchenko writes:
> >>
> >> Maybe this is a good time to start a discussion about moving
> >> Org's minimum supported Emacs to 25...?
>
> > I checked Red Hat, Centos, Debian, SuSE, and Ub
> Robert Horn writes:
> Timothy writes:
>> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>>
>> Maybe this is a good time to start a discussion about moving
>> Org's minimum supported Emacs to 25...?
> I checked Red Hat, Centos, Debian, SuSE, and Ubuntu. They are all
> 25.1 or later
Timothy writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
> Maybe this is a good time to start a discussion about moving Org's
> minimum supported Emacs to 25...?
I checked Red Hat, Centos, Debian, SuSE, and Ubuntu. They are all 25.1
or later in their current distributions. So that will probably not
cause
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> In any case, not all the warnings go away even using Emacs 25.3:
Just going to chime in here with the relevant info:
> ob-gnuplot.el:299:1:Warning: the function ‘file-local-name’ is not known to be
> defined.
:added:26.1
It looks like the definition could ju
Timothy writes:
> Maybe this is a good time to start a discussion about moving Org's
> minimum supported Emacs to 25...?
I have no objections here, since I am on Emacs master anyway.
In any case, not all the warnings go away even using Emacs 25.3:
Compiling /home/yantar92/Git/org-mode/lisp/ob-
Ihor Radchenko writes:
Maybe this is a good time to start a discussion about moving Org's
minimum supported Emacs to 25...?
--
Timothy
I was recently testing Org mode using old Emacs versions. Running make
on master fails with the following errors and warnings:
Compiling /home/yantar92/Git/org-mode/lisp/ob-C.el...
Eager macro-expansion failure: (error "Vector QPatterns not implemented yet")
Compiling /home/yantar92/Git/org-mod
28 matches
Mail list logo
