On 2024-12-08 14:03, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
pinmacs writes:
See https://list.orgmode.org/87tu063ox2.fsf@localhost/ and the parent
thread for details.
I am repeatedly seeing this in different places: patches welcome for the
new timezone orgmode timestamps. But it points to a thread with 366
pinmacs writes:
>> See https://list.orgmode.org/87tu063ox2.fsf@localhost/ and the parent
>> thread for details.
>
> I am repeatedly seeing this in different places: patches welcome for the
> new timezone orgmode timestamps. But it points to a thread with 366+
> me
elcome!
See https://list.orgmode.org/87tu063ox2.fsf@localhost/ and the parent
thread for details.
I am repeatedly seeing this in different places: patches welcome for the
new timezone orgmode timestamps. But it points to a thread with 366+
messages.
I propose to, first off, reduce complexity
pinmacs writes:
> From #11 OrgMeetup content [1] I see that a date with timestamp and
> timezone is used:
>
> <2024-09-11 Wed 19:00-21:00 @+03,Europe/Istanbul>
> ...
> Is this something is going to arrive on 9.8 ? Is this something that
> only works in development version?
This is an ide
Hi,
From #11 OrgMeetup content [1] I see that a date with timestamp and
timezone is used:
<2024-09-11 Wed 19:00-21:00 @+03,Europe/Istanbul>
With orgmode version 9.7.10:
1. If I try to to =C-c C-c= minibuffer says: "Not at a timestamp"; well,
at least, does not try to remove the timezone
Right! I found it, I hadn't realized there was a new variable in 6.27
and behavior, and I hadn't noticed the change take effect until now
when I was trying to read a file in the agenda journal mode looking
for specific times.
For future reference, the variable
org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps
I just noticed today that the agenda is now only showing the *first*
timestamp in any headline, whether active or inactive. I'm not sure
when this changed, I'm running 7.01e. I found that ability valuable,
so I suspect a bug?
Example:
* Testing multiples
<2010-10-02 Sat 05:31>
<2010-10-02 Sat 06:
Hi,
I'm using orgmode 6.30d, under the OS Ubuntu 8.04 and the general idea is to
use it to log my work and i'm facing the following issues:
- insert a constant timestamp (e.g. i forgot to insert an activity that i
did yesterday, and i want to log it. Ican't insert a clock with previous
s
Hi Chris,
this is a problem with Emacs regular expressions, not easy to fix.
Put more text between the time stamp and the cookie (20 chars or so).
- Carsten
On Dec 10, 2008, at 7:01 AM, Chris Randle wrote:
Hi Carsten
When I edit a timestamp with the shifted cursor keys on a line such
as:
Hi Carsten
When I edit a timestamp with the shifted cursor keys on a line such as:
* Today [2008-12-10 Wed] [2/10]
the checkbox cookie is removed.
--
Chris Randle
Windows XP SP3 - GNU Emacs 22.1.1 - Org-mode 6.13a
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Re
This is a bug, fixed, thanks.
- Carsten
On Oct 22, 2008, at 11:47 AM, James TD Smith wrote:
In a table column containing timestamps, pressing S-return with the
cursor on
the brackets surrounding the timestamp results the insertion of a
copy of the
timestamp with the active status toggled.
In a table column containing timestamps, pressing S-return with the cursor on
the brackets surrounding the timestamp results the insertion of a copy of the
timestamp with the active status toggled. Repeated a few times you end
up with this:
,
| | Date |
| |--|
| | [
Hi Friedrich,
I don't know a work-around other than what Bernt proposed, or other
than living with the fact that these entries will show up uselessly,
during the weekend.
I don't see a pressing need to add this, time stamps are complex enough.
You have easily have things only on weekends,
Hiho!
I'm using org with the same set of files both at work and at home
(synchronized via svn at the moment).
I have regular tasks that I do every day, but some only on workdays.
I'd like to have a robust way to specify that a certain task should be
executed Monday-Friday. When I tick it as DONE
On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:14 AM, Richard G Riley wrote:
Would it be possible for the timestamps of #+included files to be
taken
into account when publishing?
Not easily, no, Maybe when a general overhaul of org-publish happens,
not before that.
- Carsten
__
Would it be possible for the timestamps of #+included files to be taken
into account when publishing?
thanks,
r.
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
I had to look that up myself. It's 'C-u C-c .'. You may want to look
up the option org-time-stamp-rounding-minutes also.
Edd
On 11/22/06, J. David Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry everyone, I thought I saw this in the docs, but I can't find it now.
Is there someway to insert a timestam
On Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:17:19 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. David Boyd)
wrote:
> Sorry everyone, I thought I saw this in the docs, but I can't find it now.
>
> Is there someway to insert a timestamp, rather than a 'date' stamp?
Yup, there is:
C-u C-c .
Dave
> Dave
___
Sorry everyone, I thought I saw this in the docs, but I can't find it now.
Is there someway to insert a timestamp, rather than a 'date' stamp?
Dave
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgm
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I Guess a typo. org-timeclock.el from David.
Yes, that's right; I mean org-timeclock.el, by David O'Toole.
--
++
| Jason F. McBrayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| "If
I Guess a typo. org-timeclock.el from David.
- Carsten
On Jun 7, 2006, at 17:29, Xavier Maillard wrote:
2006/6/7, Jason F. McBrayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting functionality and not hard to do - I am putting it on my
> list, but I am not sure how quickly th
2006/6/7, Jason F. McBrayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Interesting functionality and not hard to do - I am putting it on my> list, but I am not sure how quickly this will happen.
I vote +1 on this. I'm using org-timestamp.el, What is that ?-- Xavier Maillard
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting functionality and not hard to do - I am putting it on my
> list, but I am not sure how quickly this will happen.
I vote +1 on this. I'm using org-timestamp.el, and it's basically
adequate to my needs, but a more-integrated solution would
Interesting functionality and not hard to do - I am putting it on my
list, but I am not sure how quickly this will happen.
- Carsten
On Jun 6, 2006, at 12:46, David O'Toole wrote:
Hi Carsten. I have another modest proposal for you :-)
I notice that org-mode has a concept of timestamp ranges
Hi Carsten. I have another modest proposal for you :-)
I notice that org-mode has a concept of timestamp ranges, and a
function to calculate the length of time in a given timestamp
range.
It seems to me that with a small amount of additional work, org-mode
could:
1. Provide a function org-clock
25 matches
Mail list logo
