Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
Dì bän só, fantèsma!
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 02:30:28PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
>> Or they can use the info doc (section 1.1, "Summary") to find the org
>> website and follow the link to Worg. Or they can ask on the list. And
>
> No, they can't, *while they
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:52:14AM +0200, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
> In mail <20100622104109.ga17...@upsilon.cc> you wrote:
> I think it would make sense to "freeze" wort at each org-mode release
> and ship a copy of it
> in a way that makes it integrated in the Emacs help system.
>
[ quoted text re-ordered ]
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 02:30:28PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Just in case it's not clear already :-) I personally don't think it's
> worth it (but I am a marginal voice at best.) What might be worth it is
Yes, that is pretty clear :), but thanks for reinstating.
Since,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:35:11AM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> > Next time you are online, just git clone the Worg repository to your
> > machine. Then periodically, git pull. Problem solved.
>
> Sure, the problem will be solved for *me* (in fact, it already is: I
> cl
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:35:11AM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Next time you are online, just git clone the Worg repository to your
> machine. Then periodically, git pull. Problem solved.
Sure, the problem will be solved for *me* (in fact, it already is: I
cloned the Worg repo just a minute later r
Nick Dokos writes:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:37:16PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> >>>(I've only now noticed that the FAQ it not part of the installed
>> >>>org-mode documentation, at least not in my distribution package: any
>> >>>reason for that?)
>> >>
>> >
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:37:16PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> >>>(I've only now noticed that the FAQ it not part of the installed
> >>>org-mode documentation, at least not in my distribution package: any
> >>>reason for that?)
> >>
> >>I think it's not included be
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:41:09 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:37:16PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> >>>(I've only now noticed that the FAQ it not part of the installed
> >>>org-mode documentation, at least not in my distribution package: any
> >>>reason for that?)
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:37:16PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
(I've only now noticed that the FAQ it not part of the installed
org-mode documentation, at least not in my distribution package: any
reason for that?)
>>>
>>>I think it's not included because
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:37:16PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>>(I've only now noticed that the FAQ it not part of the installed
>>>org-mode documentation, at least not in my distribution package: any
>>>reason for that?)
>>
>>I think it's not included because it's part of Worg, which I think
>
On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Ian Barton wrote:
On 22/06/10 08:23, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:10:19PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
this is a FAQ:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.php#timestamps-and-system-time-
locale
Ah, thanks a lot Carsten, I did miss the FAQ e
On 22/06/10 08:23, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:10:19PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
this is a FAQ:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.php#timestamps-and-system-time-locale
Ah, thanks a lot Carsten, I did miss the FAQ entry. (I've only now
noticed that the FAQ it not part
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:10:19PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> this is a FAQ:
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.php#timestamps-and-system-time-locale
Ah, thanks a lot Carsten, I did miss the FAQ entry. (I've only now
noticed that the FAQ it not part of the installed org-mode
documentation, at
Hi Stefano,
this is a FAQ:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.php#timestamps-and-system-time-locale
HTH
- Carsten
On Jun 20, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Hi all,
I use frequently C-c C-! to put inactive timestamps in Org files.
I do that also in some files which are used not
Hi all,
I use frequently C-c C-! to put inactive timestamps in Org files.
I do that also in some files which are used not only by me, but shared
among people which are used to different date formats. In that context,
it's annoying for me that Org-mode specifies weekdays using my local
language,
15 matches
Mail list logo