* On Tue 09:35AM +, 13 Jan 2009, Carsten Dominik (domi...@science.uva.nl)
wrote:
>
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 6:50 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>
> > * On Sat 08:54PM +, 10 Jan 2009, Carsten Dominik
> > (domi...@science.uva.nl
> > ) wrote:
> >> Hi Hsiu,
> >>
> >> I believe this is a misunder
On Jan 12, 2009, at 6:50 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
* On Sat 08:54PM +, 10 Jan 2009, Carsten Dominik (domi...@science.uva.nl
) wrote:
Hi Hsiu,
I believe this is a misunderstanding. You are constructing
a sparse tree. Sparse tree always show all top-level headlines.
The search really on
* On Sat 08:54PM +, 10 Jan 2009, Carsten Dominik (domi...@science.uva.nl)
wrote:
> Hi Hsiu,
>
> I believe this is a misunderstanding. You are constructing
> a sparse tree. Sparse tree always show all top-level headlines.
> The search really only matches the second one, as you can see from
>
Hi Hsiu,
I believe this is a misunderstanding. You are constructing
a sparse tree. Sparse tree always show all top-level headlines.
The search really only matches the second one, as you can see from
the highlighted stars.
Sparse tree make a lot more sense when the entries to be matched are
not
I find that doing a tags search for SCHEDULED or DEADLINE turns up headings
that do not have any schedule or deadlines.
Using the example from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/10274:
,
| #+SEQ_TODO: NEXT WAITING | DONE
| #+STARTUP: overview
|
| * DONE Test1
|CLOSED: [2009-01-
