Hi Daniel,
On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Daniel Martins wrote:
Carsten,
thanks for your reply :
1. Looks like you are using a 7 day agenda. Consider using a day
agenda
(setq org-agenda-ndays 1)
I did it
2. Looks like you are including all TODO entries into your agenda.
Consider not
Hi Daniel,
On Aug 31, 2009, at 11:25 PM, Daniel Martins wrote:
I had simply added load-path of version 6.29 and tried to load it
without sucess
Following the hints in
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.php#compiling-org-without-make
I could installed the new version and the times diminish
I had simply added load-path of version 6.29 and tried to load it without
sucess
Following the hints in
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.php#compiling-org-without-make
I could installed the new version and the times diminished.
However they are still high.
I possibly have to rearrange somethi
On 2009-08-31 22:03 +0100, Daniel Martins wrote:
> I did all but it complains about a org-agenda-list: Symbol's function
> definition is void: elp-wrapper
>
> Daniel
Maybe put (autoload 'elp-wrapper "elp") somewhere in your .emacs. This
will get your org mode to compile.
But you may want to figur
*You can always try out a new version of org-mode without changing
anything in your emacs installation. Simply download
(http://orgmode.org/org-6.29c.zip), unzip, byte-compile the files
(either from the command line or dired), and add the new directory to
your load path.*
I did all but it complai
Daniel Martins writes:
> This version is 30 days old.
Actually, org-mode 6.21b was released on Feb. 2, 2009.
But org-mode does change quickly. :)
> To do not create problems with my Ubuntu distribution it is a bit hard
> to try newer versions but I can try if this is
>
> I feel that there is
This version is 30 days old.
To do not create problems with my Ubuntu distribution it is a bit hard to
try newer versions but I can try if this is
I feel that there is something critical beyond an upgrade but I do not know
how to find the core of the problem
Other modes are not slow
Daniel
20
Daniel Martins writes:
> My org-agenda is incredibly slow. Please help me understand what is
> happening
>
> My computer is not so slow. It is a dual core
>
> Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz
> with 2GB of RAM
>
> My organizer.org has 21000 lines
>
> I can split it in a couple of files if this
On 2009-08-31 18:49 +0100, Daniel Martins wrote:
> My org-version is 6.21b
>
> GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.9)
> of 2009-08-01 on radon, modified by Debian
Have you tried a more recent org version? I think Carsten has done some
profiling a while back. I haven't notice
On Apr 28, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
I have just pushed one more optimization which may improve things a
bit
for you, Rainer.
- Carsten
...
Hi Carsten,
results see here:
before your last optimsation:
org-run-agenda-series
On Apr 25, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Eric S Fraga writes:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Ummm, this doesn't work for me? C-c C-x r is undefined.
You need to be in an org-mode buffer for this..
Ah. Yes.
I just use M-x org-reload and C-u M-x org-reload since that works
everywher
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
> I have just pushed one more optimization which may improve things a bit
> for you, Rainer.
>
> - Carsten
> ...
Hi Carsten,
results see here:
before your last optimsation:
org-run-agenda-series 1 1.797
1.797
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>> > Ummm, this doesn't work for me? C-c C-x r is undefined.
>>
>> You need to be in an org-mode buffer for this..
>
> Ah. Yes.
>
I just use M-x org-reload and C-u M-x org-reload since that works
everywhere.
C-c C-x r doesn't work in the agenda
Carsten Dominik writes:
> > Ummm, this doesn't work for me? C-c C-x r is undefined.
>
> You need to be in an org-mode buffer for this..
Ah. Yes.
> > In any case, I am impressed: from 4.5 seconds to less than a second in
> > one day! Can you do the same for my 2+ day optimisation runs I
> > re
On Apr 25, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hmmm, `org-up-heading-all' still gets called, this should no longer
happen.
I wonder why, when.
There must have been an error in recompilation after pulling the
updates with git. Although I asked emacs to recompile th
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hmmm, `org-up-heading-all' still gets called, this should no longer
> happen.
> I wonder why, when.
There must have been an error in recompilation after pulling the
updates with git. Although I asked emacs to recompile the directory,
it must have done something strange
On Apr 24, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Hi Carsten,
strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my
agenda at all.
It still is as slow or fast - however you see it.
I think you have tag
On 2009-04-24 16:57 +0100, Nick Dokos wrote:
>> Any one got a fix?
>>
>
> Does replacing 'byte-compile-file' with 'batch-byte-compile'
> make any difference?
>
> Nick
Thanks, Nick. It turned out that was a typo when I manually copied this
from my old setup.
Cheers,
--
.: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gma
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>
> > Hi Carsten,
> >
> > strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my
> > agenda at all.
> > It still is as slow or fast - however you see it.
>
> I think you have tag inheritance turned off, or
Leo wrote:
> What's really annoying is that I can on longer use the following to
> compile .el files. I am using GNU Emacs 23.0.92.1
> (i386-apple-darwin9.6.0, NS apple-appkit-949.43) of 2009-04-22 on
> neutron.local.
>
> ,[ .bash_profile ]
> | alias bbc='/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Mac
On 2009-04-24 12:35 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> With some more improvements (available now) this should get down to
> 1.5 seconds. Not perfect, but almost a factor of three from the
> original 4.35 seconds.
I have to ditch org 6.21b now for the performance gained.
What's really annoying is th
I ave just pushed one more optimization which may improve things a bit
for you, Rainer.
- Carsten
On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Hi Carsten,
strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my
agenda at all.
It still is as slow or fast - however you se
On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Hi Carsten,
strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my
agenda at all.
It still is as slow or fast - however you see it.
I think you have tag inheritance turned off, or you have everything in
top-level entries.
Hi Carsten,
strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my agenda at
all.
It still is as slow or fast - however you see it.
org-version is 6.26trans
,
| org-run-agenda-series 1
1.797 1.797
| org-agenda
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> With some more improvements (available now) this should get down to
> 1.5 seconds.
> Not perfect, but almost a factor of three from the original 4.35
> seconds.
>
> Please, everybody watch out for strange behavior in
On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Does seem faster! Numbers indicate a 2x improvement?
Yes.
With some more improvements (available now) this should get down to
1.5 seconds.
Not perfect, but almost a factor of three from the original 4.35
seconds.
Please, everybody watc
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Could you do me a favor, get the git version I just pushed and try
> to repeat the same command under the same conditions (compiled or
> uncompiled, org stuff pre-loaded because of a previous agenda
> command).
Results (with org-mode version 6.26trans):
org-agenda
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Interesting.
>
> How many entries did this search return?
Today, only 8 scheduled tasks, no diary entries, and no information in
the clock table (it's my "get things done day" ;-). Yesterday was a
much busier day with a handful more scheduled todos, 5 meetings and 4+
en
Interesting.
How many entries did this search return?
Could you do me a favor, get the git version I just pushed and try
to repeat the same command under the same conditions (compiled or
uncompiled, org stuff pre-loaded because of a previous agenda
command).
I may have made it quite a
Carsten Dominik writes:
>
> Are both of you running compiled Lisp code?
yes. I install org-mode from debian unstable which compiles all the
lisp codes.
>
> Are you using day view or week view (which makes 7 day views)
day view (used to use week view but was trying to speed things up).
> T
30 matches
Mail list logo
