Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Dec 3,2009, at 3:38 AM, andrea wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that emacs (ab)use is the right frame of reference
> here. Shouldn't we be talking about interoperability standards here?
> Orgmode supports the same core set of data that other todo list tools
> and calendar to
On Dec 3,2009, at 3:38 AM, andrea wrote:
I don't think that at the moment org-mode can be more than solitary
habit. The "problem" is that org-mode runs on emacs, and really a
small percentage of people can/want to use emacs.
If I ever will be able to work with emacs-(ab)users org-mode can b
"Tim O'Callaghan" writes:
> Hi org (ab)users
>
> This is a kind of follow up to an earlier thread, because i think
> there is some value in kicking off a discussion.
>
> I have suspicions that org-mode is essentially a solitary habit. I've
> done a quick search in the manual or FAQ about how you
